Nikon. Pick me a lense please.

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Nikon. Pick me a lense please.

Postby lukeo on Tue Feb 22, 2005 9:39 pm

Hi all,

I have the opportunity to purchase some of these lenses off a family member.

Nikon AF-D 20mm f2.8

Nikon AF-D 35-70mm f2.8

Nikon AF-D 50mm f1.8

Nikon AF-D 24-85mm f2.8-4

Sigma EX 24-70mm f2.8

If I had to pick two which two would it be? and why?

Note due to budget restrictions the Sigma is there ...
is it a good lense? I am having trouble finding quality reviews of it.
lukeo
Member
 
Posts: 310
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 1:42 am
Location: Kensington, WA

Postby jethro on Tue Feb 22, 2005 9:42 pm

birdy is THE MAN on lenses
shoot it real.

look! and see. Shoot and feel
User avatar
jethro
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1006
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:03 pm
Location: down south, sydney

Postby lukeo on Tue Feb 22, 2005 9:44 pm

I know :-p

I am hoping he will see this and reply.
lukeo
Member
 
Posts: 310
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 1:42 am
Location: Kensington, WA

Postby birddog114 on Tue Feb 22, 2005 10:13 pm

Here you go:

Nikon AF-D 35-70mm f2.8
Nikon AF-D 50mm f1.8

The rest are paperweight
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby lukeo on Tue Feb 22, 2005 10:37 pm

Thank you,

I really don't know how you do it, answer all these threads that is. You are a miracle worker.

I will take your advice. I have heard lots of good things about the 50mm F1.8 but wasn't sure about the rest.

When I come into some funds I will place my order for my 70-200VR

Regards
Luke

:-)
lukeo
Member
 
Posts: 310
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 1:42 am
Location: Kensington, WA

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Feb 22, 2005 10:43 pm

yraen69 - try this for pics with the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8

http://www.pbase.com/cameras/sigma/2470_28_ex_dg_asp_df
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby JordanP on Tue Feb 22, 2005 11:23 pm

I could cope with a 20mm 2.8 as a paperweight :shock:

That being said I would say that Birddog nailed it on the head, I would go with his choices in the order he typed them.
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby lukeo on Tue Feb 22, 2005 11:39 pm

Some great shots from that sigma :-) If my budget get's really tight I might have to consider it. I am partial to nikon glass however. Thank you for sharing those. some great photo's, really puts thing in perspective.

I thought the 20mm would be an ok lense, but I am going with Birddog on this one, I'm not touching it.
lukeo
Member
 
Posts: 310
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 1:42 am
Location: Kensington, WA

Re: Nikon. Pick me a lense please.

Postby Link on Tue Feb 22, 2005 11:40 pm

yraen69 wrote:If I had to pick two which two would it be? and why?


I think it'd also depend on the lens you already own. Unfortunately I haven't used any of them so I can't really tell... But this 20mm F/2.8 looks good on paper!

Link.
User avatar
Link
Member
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:07 pm
Location: Nowra

Postby gooseberry on Tue Feb 22, 2005 11:47 pm

If you're into wide angle and you can get a good price on the 20mm/2.8 I'd get it. The 50/1.8 is a great lens, but is so cheap you can buy it new, not much saving in getting it second hand. The list price for the 20/2.8 is over $1K, so if you can get it at a good price, I'd go with it.
User avatar
gooseberry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 541
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 7:18 pm
Location: Singapore

Postby Glen on Wed Feb 23, 2005 12:11 am

For a D70 user I would go with Birddys view, but as gooseberry said the 20 2.8 is an expensive lens. I have it, but have only stuck it on the D70 once, due to the kit covering that length and it isn't really a wide anymore, so not a useful length for the money on a digital body. Mind you in 2010 when a FF body comes out, I'll already have a wide angle. If they are really cheap, and it would not be using a situation, buy the 20 and resell it. Still get $400-$600 S/H. The 50mm 1.8 is $200 new.





Edit You know none of these fit on a *ist DS? :wink:
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby birddog114 on Wed Feb 23, 2005 5:52 am

gooseberry wrote:If you're into wide angle and you can get a good price on the 20mm/2.8 I'd get it. The 50/1.8 is a great lens, but is so cheap you can buy it new, not much saving in getting it second hand. The list price for the 20/2.8 is over $1K, so if you can get it at a good price, I'd go with it.


The 20/2.8 is around $600.00/ 35-70 is $900.00 Aussie Plastic.
The 20/2.8 is not so good in DSLR and is not my choice, on FF maybe it has the place to stand.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby lukeo on Wed Feb 23, 2005 4:55 pm

The 20mm was used on a nikon F5. I actually liked it when used in conjunction with that wonderful camera. Stuck on a D70 I don't think it would do allot for me, 30mm isn't all that useful not wide enough when you want wide and to short when what you really want is 50mm.

I could buy it and sell again, but my finanaces really are streched tight at the momment.

I think the 50mm, 35-70 are as Birdy says the way to go.

thanks for the feedback everyone.
lukeo
Member
 
Posts: 310
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 1:42 am
Location: Kensington, WA

Hi

Postby yeocsa on Wed Feb 23, 2005 5:20 pm

yraen69 wrote:The 20mm was used on a nikon F5. I actually liked it when used in conjunction with that wonderful camera. Stuck on a D70 I don't think it would do allot for me, 30mm isn't all that useful not wide enough when you want wide and to short when what you really want is 50mm.

I could buy it and sell again, but my finanaces really are streched tight at the momment.

I think the 50mm, 35-70 are as Birdy says the way to go.

thanks for the feedback everyone.


Hi

I am intereted in the 20mm. How much is it going for? I am thinking of using it as a reverse macro lens.

regards,

Arthur
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby lukeo on Wed Feb 23, 2005 5:42 pm

Hmm not sure if I can arrange that, the lense's are from a family member, both myself and another friend of mine have the oppurtunity to purchase them, with the condition I get first dip.

The family member is older and I think would prefer I didn't buy the lenses off him and then on sell them. Thats just my feeling on the matter. I was only half serious in my last post. Sorry about that.
lukeo
Member
 
Posts: 310
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 1:42 am
Location: Kensington, WA


Return to General Discussion