Question on RF vs RM and uses.
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:51 pm
Okay.
After lots of trawling and reading I'm a little more educated on this subject but none the wiser to having answers to the finer points. Hopefully someone here can shed some light on the subject for me.
Recently I've been looking into stock photography. Firstly I've decided not to go with companies such as shutterstock simply because A) I'm in business for myself as an Electrician and I know how people who are willing to work for nothing (Quality of the work does not become a factor here, the selling point is by based on cheap prices) The same would go for Photography I would imagine. The more people willing to sell their images for nothing the cheaper those images become irrespective of quality.
I've been looking at sites like Corbis and Alamy. I haven't yet applied to Corbis but have been accepted to upload to Alamy with all 4 images passing QC.
If I have a image where a logo or brandname is clearly visible but not the focus of the image can I license the image under RM and where does 'for editorial use only' fall into this category? What impact does this have on the saleability of the image?
I've also noticed on Alamy that some images are licensed under RM AND RF? How can someone have a Rights managed Image, and list it as Royalty free at the same time, to me and my understanding that sort of negates the the whole idea of licensing an image under Rights Managed?
After lots of trawling and reading I'm a little more educated on this subject but none the wiser to having answers to the finer points. Hopefully someone here can shed some light on the subject for me.
Recently I've been looking into stock photography. Firstly I've decided not to go with companies such as shutterstock simply because A) I'm in business for myself as an Electrician and I know how people who are willing to work for nothing (Quality of the work does not become a factor here, the selling point is by based on cheap prices) The same would go for Photography I would imagine. The more people willing to sell their images for nothing the cheaper those images become irrespective of quality.
I've been looking at sites like Corbis and Alamy. I haven't yet applied to Corbis but have been accepted to upload to Alamy with all 4 images passing QC.
If I have a image where a logo or brandname is clearly visible but not the focus of the image can I license the image under RM and where does 'for editorial use only' fall into this category? What impact does this have on the saleability of the image?
I've also noticed on Alamy that some images are licensed under RM AND RF? How can someone have a Rights managed Image, and list it as Royalty free at the same time, to me and my understanding that sort of negates the the whole idea of licensing an image under Rights Managed?