Panoramic Measurements ??????

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Panoramic Measurements ??????

Postby hrpremier on Wed Jul 02, 2008 5:02 pm

Simple question and hopefully a simple answer. Having a conversation with some one trying to make a panoramic landscape the other night by stitching a number of pics together. The question is - Is there a standard measurement for a panoramic scene ie 6" * 4'' is industry standard. I thought the 1:3 ratio (eg 4" high * 12" wide) would be a starting point but my off sider said whatever crop looks best is usually the best option.

Cheers In Advance.


hrpremier

Jase
4869
Guess What! ........I Have A Fever........And The Only Perscription........Is More Cowbell.
User avatar
hrpremier
Member
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 10:18 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland

Re: Panoramic Measurements ??????

Postby Killakoala on Wed Jul 02, 2008 7:05 pm

I don't believe there is an 'industry standard.' I've never heard of one. The width of your image depends on the size of your subject I would image. :)
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Re: Panoramic Measurements ??????

Postby robert on Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:55 pm

In the days before stitching the premier panoramic cameras were 6x17 (eg linhof technorama or fuji 617), that is they produced a neg 6cm by 17cm, so that might be where you heard the 1:3 ratio.

As far as stitching goes if you shooting in portrait mode i find 4 shots works well, as you have a bit of overlap and gets you cloes to the 1:3. Having said that just shoot as many as you feel needed, i have some 8 or 9 shots pano's and they look a OK,and I printed them at 900mm x around 200mm. Although I think they look a little too long.

Robert
Robert
EOS 5D Mk II, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200f4 IS, 50 f1.8, 100 macro, 300D (IR Mod)
User avatar
robert
Member
 
Posts: 378
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:16 pm
Location: Sutherland, Sydney

Re: Panoramic Measurements ??????

Postby Killakoala on Thu Jul 03, 2008 6:33 pm

Really long panos make excellent bookmarks. This one did.

Image

This is my Pano gallery. As you can see there is quite a varied number of widths.
http://www.stevekilburn.com/gallery/292 ... 5227_znaTJ

I don't think it really matters anymores.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Re: Panoramic Measurements ??????

Postby big pix on Thu Jul 03, 2008 7:26 pm

....... there is no set size to panos....... in days gone by the size of panos was governed by cut photographic paper sizes used in the darkroom, and how many you could get out of a sheet....... today it will depend on the number of images you are stitching together and if they are vertical or horizontal along with your final crop.......... it all comes back to what you like........ long and thin, or not so long and deep..... or some thing else
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.


Return to General Discussion