First of all, thank you Matt for asking this question. It bothers me, too, that the participation level is so low.
wheels wrote: but unfortunately I'm not an actual member yet (post count etc). Had I known there were only 9 I mighta just started posting inane stuff
Posting inane, garbage, crappy (whatever) messages wot do yourself any favours. However, your post count is > 90, and the basic qualifying requirements are 30 days' membership, 50 posts, an image, and a meaningful location in your profile. Then you just send a PM to myself or one of the
mods ...
Biggerry, you've also been to one of our minimeets. We generally regard that as the equivalent of about ten posts; you would have no issues were you to ask.
Cre8tivepixels wrote:I know i would never get a look in due to past 'indiscretions' so i wont enter. I would like too
Dan Dan Dan Dan ... You disappoint and upset me with this sort of comment. As Philip points out, the judging is totally anonymous.
Ok, there's three people who have absolutely no excuse whatsoever for not entering the current challenge!
Radar wrote:One of the things that would help, I think, is to have the challenge gallery linked to the site so that you don't need a separate user name to access the galleries on Scott's (MHD) site. That way, if you are logged in on the forums,
Andre, we have looked to find a suitable integration of gallery with the forum software, but have yet to find something that provides a level of integration that I find acceptable. Let me go further: I am not impressed with most of the gallery style software that I've seen, so I need to find one that I like, first, and then customise it to integrate with forum, and then, finally, customise it further to provide what Scott has done with Gallery in his. I'm open to suggestions - please provide me with URLs.
I do make an effort to enter the challenges as I find that it can push me out of my comfort zone or to try something different.
And that is the reason that we hold these challenges, and it's the reason that they are called challenges. It's all very well to go out and shoot what you normally shoot, but that can often become routine and put you into a rut. If you have to go out and shoot something different, then it (hopefully) will help you to go out and learn something about your equipment, about the processes involved in shooting something dictated to you by a third party, about your photography, and you occasionally get a chance to win some cool prizes as well.
LIVE4EVA wrote:it is a challenge for us to work harder and capture something really worth entering.
Exactly!
But why do you worry about what others may be posting? With all due respect, I think that's a somewhat silly attitude. Others have expressed something similar, but that is avoiding the whole point of these challenges ... which, surely, is to participate in the challenge?
Robert wrote:For me the big reservation in entering a comp is somehow I think its pointless to enter when i know I wont win
Robert, may I suggest you talk to Glen about who might be likely, or not, to win a challenge?
Adam, aim54x ... I've added both of you to the list of "No excuse for this challenge" participants.
Trevor, great point: now, if everyone who responds to this thread (who is not a judge) can go out and put in an entry, then you'll be making our task, as judges, that much more difficult. And that is exactly what we want!
And please, do not worry about whether your entry is good enough: rest assured that it is.
Just do it!