Page 1 of 1

three is a crowd

PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 2:54 pm
by wendellt
hi guys just generating chatter for this opinion
i find having 2 camera's is perfect not only for practical reasons
but it looks good walking down the street with 2 camera's one on each shoulder
question is why is two sweet and 3 cameras hanging off you not

if i had to have 3 cameras it would be 1 wirth a wide angle lens the other with a telephoto and the 3rd one a rangfinder around my neck

discussion...

Re: three is a crowd

PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 3:01 pm
by sirhc55
My opinion is this, one camera amateur, 2 cameras pro, three cameras total wanker :roll:

Re: three is a crowd

PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 3:06 pm
by Reschsmooth
I stick with the 2 camera rule: 1 SLR & 1 MF. It gives me street cred, without being a total wanker, as Chris said. Well, I don't want to publicise the fact that I am total wanker :D

Re: three is a crowd

PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 4:32 pm
by Glen
sirhc55 wrote:My opinion is this, one camera amateur, 2 cameras pro, three cameras total wanker :roll:


:lol: :lol: :lol:




Have you been to the gym a lot recently Wendell? 3 cameras will weigh about 50% of what you do!

Re: three is a crowd

PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 4:47 pm
by gstark
wendellt wrote:i find having 2 camera's is perfect not only for practical reasons


Are reasons beyond the practical? Please explain.

but it looks good walking down the street with 2 camera's one on each shoulder


It does? Who says so?

And since when does "it looks good" have anything to do with one's photography skills?

Re: three is a crowd

PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 4:56 pm
by soarer
Why would you walk around the streets with 2 cameras hanging off you let alone 3??? :shock:
I think 2 hanging off the shoulders is wanky, unless you're on a shoot or something

Re: three is a crowd

PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 5:00 pm
by PiroStitch
For an event, 2 bodies is ideal as you'd have one for your tele and another either for a prime or a wide to mid zoom. As for 3...I don't know, just doesn't seem practical. I've seen a few people do it but it's just uncomfortable in terms of practicalities....

Re: three is a crowd

PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 5:30 pm
by phillipb
I think I know why Wendell is asking this question. He's planning on carrying every bit of equipment he owns on him all the time so that it doesn't get knocked off. Don't worry about how goofy it looks mate, just do it. :D

Re: three is a crowd

PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 5:43 pm
by gstark
phillipb wrote:I think I know why Wendell is asking this question. He's planning on carrying every bit of equipment he owns on him all the time so that it doesn't get knocked off. Don't worry about how goofy it looks mate, just do it. :D


Phillip,

Nice thought, but I don't think that's quite right. Wendell lost stuff on his last trip, so I expect that, at our next event, we can see him turn up with just one shoulder, and his prosthetic leg will have gone astray as well. :)

But the good news is that we can set up a boulles game using his glass eye and his silicone testicle. :P :P :P

Re: three is a crowd

PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 5:45 pm
by gstark
gstark wrote:and his silicone testicle. :P :P :P


And what was this thread's title, again? :) :)

Re: three is a crowd

PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 5:58 pm
by Yi-P
I only have TWO hands... :roll:

Re: three is a crowd

PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 6:09 pm
by Reschsmooth
soarer wrote:Why would you walk around the streets with 2 cameras hanging off you let alone 3??? :shock:
I think 2 hanging off the shoulders is wanky, unless you're on a shoot or something


Perhaps you want to shoot in two different formats - digital and medium format?