moz wrote:gstark wrote:Light tents come in a variety of sizes, and of course you can move your subject within the light tent in order to obtain a different angle of view of that subject.
I regularly need to light trikes that are about 3m long, 1m wide and 1m high... any suggestions?
Have you considered renting a studio space for a half day or so?
At 3m long, we're talking big lights to do the job properly, and of course (and as you've noted) you need good clearance around your subjects, plus, with larger subjects and greater distances, backgrounds can and do become more difficult to maintain control over. A proper studio permits all of these issues to be within your sphere of influence.
Earlier in the year we rented a studio facility for a portraiture session, and the cost for the day was around PP400 or so. The studio had good lights available for our use, along with some very good, and very big, reflectors.
Given that what you're doing is a commercial venture, I would seriously consider using such a facility.
Also, you have, with these trikes, one other issue that we've not yet canvassed: they have highly reflective surfaces, and that may also be a cause of concern in your images. You may have a need for some subtractors as well as reflectors and softboxes.
I think I would be wanting to use a very large softy, positioned overhead and forward of the subject. I would like the softy to be about the same length as the subject.
As an alternative, as long as you have the space around the subject, perhaps consider darkening the room and then making a long-time exposure and using light painting for your illumination, aiming to get the subject well lit within a darker environment that you can the photochop out of the image.
The main problem I think I have is space -
I will politely restrain myself at this point.
I don't actually have a big enough indoor space to let me get more than about 2m away from the trike without spending a week clearing out the factory. So a lot of the photos end up being taken outside. I'd really like something like a "light marquee" that I could set up fairly easily in the carpark and use for shooting stuff like those vehicles.
Ok ... we have a couple of ideas to explore here.
Typically, a large roll of background paper is what ... four meters long? I don't think that's long enough to give you a decent background plus clear area that you'd need for side-on shots of the trike. Frontals, and the work bike, perhaps. A pair of stands, a cross-beam, one roll of paper, and you may not need to do quite as much clearing out.
What about one of those canvass pergolas that you buy for not-too-many-pesos? The immediate problem I see with that is that their legs may become intrusive. But get one that's basic white, throw some background paper and a couple of white sheets into the mix, and you have a rather large outdoors-capable light tent. Use it on a sunny day and you're set.
These were taken in the small showroom area with a paper backdrop, but it shut down the showroom for the day
At what cost, including teardown and setup of the showroom, plus bumping in and out the photography gear? And the loss of the facility for the day.
What's the comparative cost against that of hiring a studio for a half-day or so? Remember that in a good sized facility you may have several discreet areas available to use, and thus you could do one sort of shoot here, and something entirely different over there, thus maximising your use of the facility, whereas in a smaller area, you might need to spend more time in teardowns and resetting stuff up.
For lighting, I used the track lights in the showroom but bounced them off the ceiling. Plus added a couple of 500W halogen spots that were lying around.
I'd be curious to find out if the track lighting (150w, 12v?) actually contributed that much to the image. If you're using a couple of 500w halogens, and they're somewhat closer than the bounced tracklights, the likelihood that they were adding light is probably not all that great.
A few 500w halogens would provide some element of good controlable light, and they could easily be bounced or diffused in some way.
But despite the skepticism of more knowlegable people than myself I'm also very tempted by compact fluoro spotlights just because they don't bake the work area and they're cheaper than studio flashes (plus they are generally useful, unlike studio flashes).
As I said, they're likely to be underpowered, and give you all manner of wb issues. Flouro is notorious in terms of being able to control the colour, and domestic lighting comes totally uncalibrated: you may end up a real dog's breakfast. By all means try it - I'm not going to argue with that - but I wouldn't be expecting the results to be of too high a quality.