Page 1 of 1
Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:38 pm
by surenj
Now that every Tom, Dick and Harry is using a smart phone, and sometimes browsing the net, I wonder how many are using this medium regularly to read or post to DSLRusers.com??
Since the Ipad is something inbetween, I was going to exclude those unless it had a SIM card and you were dialling in.
Re: Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:13 pm
by gstark
I challenge the premise of this: is there such a thing as a "smart phone" ? I would contend that there are many phones tagged as such, but there is actually no such thing.
Re: Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Wed Jul 21, 2010 7:13 pm
by surenj
Gary how about rewording it so that we use mobile phone (defined as phone with a SIM card which you use on the go) instead of smart-phone?
Re: Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:09 pm
by Mr Darcy
WHat's a smartphone.
The smartest oneI have is my landline. It ALWAYS manages to get a call connection. Something my mobile is not clever enoough to do. It can't be used to access the net though (Unless I want to dust off my old 300bd
modem - Nahh!)
In case you haven't worked it out, I'm with Gary on this one. I choose option 99. THere ain't no such thing.
Re: Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:35 pm
by DaveB
"Smartphone"
It's just an effing label guys!
If it offends you at all, try putting the quotes around it and see if that makes you feel better.
My understanding of the question was that "small-screen pocket internet device" was what surenj was asking about.
Re: Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Wed Jul 21, 2010 10:18 pm
by sirhc55
I have actually worked out what is smart! I’m tossing my mobile to the far winds
Re: Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Thu Jul 22, 2010 1:13 pm
by biggerry
It's just an effing label guys!
the intent is obvious
Used with Tapatalk, or even just a browser on a phone with a decent screen the experience is quite good, great for when your waiting at teh pub for someone or on the bus etc...or trying to find the address of a meetup when you think you have actually arrived
Re: Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Fri Jul 23, 2010 12:59 am
by aim54x
I have a "small screen pocket internet device" but it is far from the fabled "smartphone"
My phone doesnt have a 3G connection! However I can access the internet using this device, so does it count as a "smartphone"???
Re: Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Fri Jul 23, 2010 11:16 am
by ozimax
My old iPhone may be smart, but I'm not.
Re: Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Fri Jul 23, 2010 11:23 am
by DaveB
Cam, in the context of this thread the relevant question about your phone is not whether it's a "smartphone", but rather "Can/do you access DSLRusers from it?".
Just call me Killjoy...
Re: Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Fri Jul 23, 2010 11:58 am
by biggerry
DaveB wrote:Cam, in the context of this thread the relevant question about your phone is not whether it's a "smartphone", but rather "Can/do you access DSLRusers from it?".
Just call me Killjoy...
or more correctly
how many are using this medium regularly to read or post to DSLRusers.com
How often do you use a smartphone to access DSLRusers.com?
this thread is a great example of how to make a simple poll complicated...
Re: Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Fri Jul 23, 2010 12:12 pm
by aim54x
DaveB wrote:Cam, in the context of this thread the relevant question about your phone is not whether it's a "smartphone", but rather "Can/do you access DSLRusers from it?".
Just call me Killjoy...
I can use it to access the internet, and have used it to access DSLRusers.com on occasion, so in the context of this thread my phone is a "smartphone"???
By that definition, almost every phone is a "smartphone" in this context. Even if they have to go to the full site via a simple browser.....
Re: Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Fri Jul 23, 2010 12:18 pm
by gstark
Could it be said that any phone that can access this forum is smart?
Re: Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Fri Jul 23, 2010 12:26 pm
by aim54x
gstark wrote:Could it be said that any phone that can access this forum is smart?
When you put it that way....then I guess my phone is SMART!!!
Re: Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Fri Jul 23, 2010 1:41 pm
by Alex
Smart phone and dslusers?
I'm having enough trouble just visiting this site from a normal computer. It's one of the slowest websites I get to visit and despite of ticking "stay logged in" option, it logs me out every time. It logs me out even if I do not close the browser but go back, for example. I have the same issue at home on 2 desktops and on my work laptop.
Alex
Re: Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:23 pm
by gstark
Alex,
Which URLs are you using? If you're not using the dslrusers.com domain, then you will experience the symptoms you're describing.
But I am regularly able to access the site with no major performance issues from land based iinet and exetel connections, as well as mobile on Three, Virgin, and at the moment, Voda as well.
Please, all, let's not turn this thread into a performance discussion. Alex has raised one issue, and I will try to resolve just that one issue, quickly if I can.
Re: Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:26 pm
by Alex
gstark wrote:Alex,
Which URLs are you using? If you're not using the dslrusers.com domain, then you will experience the symptoms you're describing.
But I am regularly able to access the site with no major performance issues from land based iinet and exetel connections, as well as mobile on Three, Virgin, and at the moment, Voda as well.
Please, all, let's not turn this thread into a performance discussion. Alex has raised one issue, and I will try to resolve just that one issue, quickly if I can.
Hi Gary,
I was using
http://www.dslrusers.NET. I have tried .COM and that has fixed the staying logged in issue - thanks.
The speed does not seem to have improved, but speed I can tolerate.
The other issue that is happening with both .net and .com alike is that often when I go to the "recent" section there is nothing there or only one post and that's for the past 5 days. So to see more I have to select 7 or 10 days. I know there must be more than 1 post in the last 5 days... Am I alone seeing this?
Thanks
Alex
Re: Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Fri Jul 23, 2010 6:20 pm
by Mr Darcy
.NET will do it every time.
Not only that, If I post using .COM, & then you post a reply to my post using .NET, when I click the link in my mail message, I will be logged out too. Frustrating, but a fact of life.
As for the other, are you sure that is for the last five days. The default view is for the last day & that clocks over at about 4pm AEST, so if you log in at 4:30 AEST, then click on the RECENT tab you will only see one or two message at best.
You need to manually click the DAYS button to see the last 5 days. Another frustrating fact of life, but I know this one frustrates Gary too. Nothing he can do about it.
I use the following link in my favourites toolbar of FF.
http://www.dslrusers.com/portal/portal_recent_topics.php?mode=lastXdays&amount_days=2It seems to work fine.
Re: Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:22 pm
by gstark
Alex,
What Greg has just said.
The time that Greg's referring to will be midnight Colorado time, which is where the codebase's server lives. One of the facts of life is that on a shared server, you don't get too much in the way of customisation options, nor in the choice of tools and setup options.
We are always looking at different possibilities and there's also always new tools that we're evaluating; it's a matter of finding the right combination of services and pricing.
Re: Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Fri Jul 23, 2010 11:09 pm
by Alex
Thank you Gary and Greg. That was informative!
Cheers
Alex
Re: Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:20 pm
by surenj
Thanks for all replies.
I was hoping to get about 50-75 responses on the poll to make the statistics a little more believable.
It would be very interesting to repeat this survey in one year so so to see what the trend might be.
Re: Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:50 pm
by biggerry
surenj wrote:I was hoping to get about 50-75 responses on the poll to make the statistics a little more believable.
maybe if the polls worked in tapatalk it would help
surenj wrote:It would be very interesting to repeat this survey in one year so so to see what the trend might be.
I got 10 bucks on it that it will just as off topic as this one..if not more
Re: Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Tue Jul 27, 2010 12:25 pm
by surenj
biggerry wrote:maybe if the polls worked in tapatalk it would help
biggerry wrote:I got 10 bucks on it that it will just as off topic as this one..if not more
At least a few people have been good enough to vote... Good thing about the poll is that you can't go too off topic..
Re: Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:18 pm
by Killakoala
I'm still waiting for an affordable data plan.
Gunna be waiting a while I feel.
Re: Smart phones vs DSLRusers.com
Posted:
Sat Jul 31, 2010 1:55 pm
by photohiker
Killakoala wrote:I'm still waiting for an affordable data plan.
Gunna be waiting a while I feel.
Telstra just bumped the data on their
$49 Business cap by a gig, so 1.2gb now. (You just need an ABN to get the business cap, retail $49 cap gets 500mb)
Dunno if you would rate that as affordable, but its not too bad in my book...
Michael