Playing with White Balance

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Playing with White Balance

Postby KerryPierce on Thu Mar 24, 2005 1:46 pm

These 2 shots were taken within a few minutes of each other. The first one was taken using the Cloudy WB, the 2nd was with Flash WB presets in the camera.

Nikon D70 ,Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 EX DC
1/80s f/11.0 at 18.0mm ISO 200 hand held

Image

Nikon D70 ,Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 EX DC
1/80s f/11.0 at 18.0mm ISO 200 hand held

Image
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby Greg B on Thu Mar 24, 2005 1:54 pm

Quite a difference Kerry! Nice shot(s) too, looks like your trademark landscape!

There was a thread (which I now can't find - or was it a link...) which showed that two of the WB settings in camera have been reversed.

Anybody remember where that was?
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby Nikkofan on Thu Mar 24, 2005 1:57 pm

Greg

I think it's in one of the White Balance tutorials.
Nikkofan
Member
 
Posts: 247
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 11:50 am
Location: Sydney's Beautiful South

Postby SoCal Steve on Thu Mar 24, 2005 2:07 pm

Quite a dramatic difference. Both very nice in their own right, but I'm partial to the first image because of the colors and the foreground details.

Does anyone have experience or preferences of in-camera vs PS Camera Raw white balance adjustments? Can adjustments in PS Raw settings be as effective and dramatic as this shows the in-camera settings to be?
Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays off now.
User avatar
SoCal Steve
Senior Member
 
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 6:25 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Postby KerryPierce on Thu Mar 24, 2005 2:09 pm

Greg B wrote:Quite a difference Kerry! Nice shot(s) too, looks like your trademark landscape!

There was a thread (which I now can't find - or was it a link...) which showed that two of the WB settings in camera have been reversed.

Anybody remember where that was?


Thanks, Greg. :) I'm putting together a bunch of Detroit shots for some local art galleries. So, I've been concentrating on various shots of the city for the last couple of months. I'm hoping to find a few buyers to help support my habit. :twisted:

Besides, there's not much else here to shoot without driving a couple of hours out of the metro area. :cry:

Haven't heard about the WB presets being switched. I'll have to look for the tutorial Nikko mentioned. Thanks for that! :)
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby Greg B on Thu Mar 24, 2005 2:16 pm

Well done nikko, yes it is in the tutorial. The flash and cloudy presets have apparently been reversed!

I really like your Detroit shots Kerry, the lake and the dramatic skies are rich pickings, and you capture them beautifully. Good luck with the plan.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby ajax on Thu Mar 24, 2005 2:22 pm

Hope is immortal...
User avatar
ajax
Member
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 8:13 am
Location: Glen Waverley, VIC

Postby Nikkofan on Thu Mar 24, 2005 2:27 pm

Greg B wrote:Well done nikko, yes it is in the tutorial.


Thank God! - Maybe there's hope for the old brain yet!
Nikkofan
Member
 
Posts: 247
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 11:50 am
Location: Sydney's Beautiful South

Postby KerryPierce on Thu Mar 24, 2005 2:42 pm

hmm, having read the tutorial, now I'm confused. :? :?:

If the Flash and Cloudy presets were switched, wouldn't that mean that my photos should also be reversed? The first one is Cloudy and has more red/yellow. The second one is Flash and is definitely more blue than the first. :o

rats.... Now I'll have to dig out the originals and make sure that I didn't do something in post to alter the WB to that degree. Best I can recall is that I simply enhanced the colors that were already there. But, I'll double check to make sure. You know, they say the memory is the 2nd thing to go as you get older....... :(
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby mudder on Thu Mar 24, 2005 2:46 pm

beep, beep, beep... Dumb question alert!!!

When it comes to the ol' mix-up between the flash and cloudy WB setting, I assume with JPEGS the mix-up is actually applied to the image, whereas with NEFs the mix-up is bypassed because the WB is performed by your software which does not have the same issue???

Confused Mudder :oops:
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby KerryPierce on Thu Mar 24, 2005 2:56 pm

KerryPierce wrote:hmm, having read the tutorial, now I'm confused. :? :?:

If the Flash and Cloudy presets were switched, wouldn't that mean that my photos should also be reversed? The first one is Cloudy and has more red/yellow. The second one is Flash and is definitely more blue than the first. :o

rats.... Now I'll have to dig out the originals and make sure that I didn't do something in post to alter the WB to that degree. Best I can recall is that I simply enhanced the colors that were already there. But, I'll double check to make sure. You know, they say the memory is the 2nd thing to go as you get older....... :(


Well, no, apparently reading comprehension is the 2nd thing to go... My shots do demonstrate that the WB presets are reversed. Cloudy should have more blue than flash and it doesn't, even in the originals. :D

So, when I said I was confused, I was certainly right! I think it's time to hit the sack and get some sleep before I step on it again. :shock:
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby Greg B on Thu Mar 24, 2005 2:59 pm

mudder, when you open a NEF in PS, it starts in the RAW dialog box with the WB chosen by the camera, but you can change it. So the answer is yes and no, or no and yes, or probably.

But with jpegs, the answer is, you are stuck with it.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby mudder on Thu Mar 24, 2005 3:12 pm

Greg B wrote:mudder, when you open a NEF in PS, it starts in the RAW dialog box with the WB chosen by the camera, but you can change it. So the answer is yes and no, or no and yes, or probably.

But with jpegs, the answer is, you are stuck with it.


Thanks Greg,
Does that mean that when opening the NEF in Nikon Capture, if the WB is left as "camera" or "as shot" (or what-ever it's called) Nikon Capture applies the same erroneous WB, where-as if you set it to other than camera (or what-ever) then it's OK (ie: not mixed up)? That implies the WB applied to the NEF as a tag by the camera is set as a color temp rather than a WB type (like cloudy, shade etc)?

JPEGs I assume you ain't got no choice, as it's already applied...

Cheers
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

more white balance funny stuff

Postby KerryPierce on Thu Mar 24, 2005 3:26 pm

Here are some more images that I took yesterday.

The first one is Direct Sunlight WB and the 2nd is Flash. The flash shot is certainly more red than the Sun shot, so it looks like my camera takes flash even more red than the one used in your tutorial... :(

This was bothering me and couldn't go to bed until I got this straight too. I couldn't figure out why the flash shot turned out pink... :)

Image

Image
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby Greg B on Thu Mar 24, 2005 3:26 pm

Not sure about NC Andrew, but I assume you could change it, and you can see it happen, so you are going to get what you want anyway. I think.

:)
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby Greg B on Thu Mar 24, 2005 3:27 pm

That's a great old fire truck Kerry!
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby KerryPierce on Thu Mar 24, 2005 3:35 pm

Thanks Greg, but which color do you perfer, the pink or blue? :lol:

This old truck is now owned by a restaurant and is permanently parked in the corner of their parking lot on the trailer. It's very cool to look at, but is in a terrible place to photograph. :)
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby mudder on Thu Mar 24, 2005 3:39 pm

G'day Greg,
Yep you can change it, it just defaults to "as shot" or "camera" or what-ever, was just curious...

I *think* when I've changed it from "camera" cloudy to Nikon Capture's version of cloudy, I *think* you can see the difference... That probably explains where the issue is, ie: in camera and not in the settings/color temps that Nikon Capture uses for the same settings...

Thanks for the info...

Cheers
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby Greg B on Thu Mar 24, 2005 3:56 pm

I prefer the blue one Kerry, the bluer sky works better, IMHO, with the red of the truck.

And yes, it does look like a tricky spot. Youhave worked hard to minimise distractions I think.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby fozzie on Thu Mar 24, 2005 4:13 pm

Hi Kerry,

I prefer the first shot 'Direct Sunlight WB' of the fire truck.

If you can not work it out why there is a difference, what hope is there for us mere mortals :!:
fozzie

When people ask what equipment I use - I tell them my eyes.
User avatar
fozzie
Key Member
 
Posts: 2806
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:19 pm
Location: AUADA : Nikon D3/D2x - JPG Shooter

Postby KerryPierce on Fri Mar 25, 2005 12:39 am

fozzie wrote:Hi Kerry,

I prefer the first shot 'Direct Sunlight WB' of the fire truck.

If you can not work it out why there is a difference, what hope is there for us mere mortals :!:


Hi Fozzie,

Sorry, I was making an attempt at humor with the question on preference of the fire truck shot. Obviously, I was a little too obtuse. :( My brain was mush from being too tired last night. I too, am a mere mortal, which is just fine by me. :)

As for working out the difference, the problem I was alluding to was the distinct magenta cast to the Flash WB shot. Both shots are straight out of the camera, only being resized, so there's no issues with post processing. The Flash WB should have been close, but slightly cooler than the Daylight WB shot. Obviously, it is not. I don't know color temp is being used by the Flash WB preset, but it is obviously not close to 5400k. I'll not be using that preset again for daylight shots. :?

This has been a very instructive thread for me and I'm happy that I learned something significant. :D
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby kipper on Fri Mar 25, 2005 6:03 am

Kerry, it's amazing what WB will do for a landscape. I was using the clouds as a white balance preset when I was in the UK and then taking photos and the dramatic clouds came out quite vivid with lots of orange from the sun reflecting off of them. Changed in NCE the WB to Calculate Automatically and while the greys looked quite neutral and the white looked snow white, the scene turned from dramatic and colorful to boring.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK


Return to General Discussion