Street Photography Case

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Street Photography Case

Postby Alpha_7 on Fri May 27, 2011 12:31 pm

Thought I'd share a strobist blog post about a photographer in the 90's who used NYC as a public 'studio' mounting flashes in the street to light up strangers as they pass. Thought it might be interesting to hear members take on the concept and as the article raises the possible ethics of it.

http://strobist.blogspot.com/2011/05/sidewalk-art.html
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Re: Street Photography Case

Postby Murray Foote on Fri May 27, 2011 5:36 pm

Hi Craig

I think this is the crux of it "In his lawsuit, Nussenzweig argued that use of the photograph interfered with his constitutional right to practice his religion, which prohibits the use of graven images." Although he sued for "exhibiting and publishing the portrait without permission and profiting from it financially", what he was really trying to do was to demand that the rest of the world be forced to comply with his own personal religious convictions.

Photography in public places in countries other than France remains for the most part legally unexeptionable, though this is often not what people say. The only thing I wonder about is whether the use of remote flashes might constitute a form of harrassment. He could have set up battery-powered lights or used available light.
User avatar
Murray Foote
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1291
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:31 pm
Location: Ainslie, Canberra

Re: Street Photography Case

Postby Matt. K on Sat May 28, 2011 6:28 pm

Why the bloody hell do people think they have rights over the light that bounces off them!!!
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Re: Street Photography Case

Postby aim54x on Sat May 28, 2011 9:56 pm

Matt. K wrote:Why the bloody hell do people think they have rights over the light that bounces off them!!!


*LIKE*
:cheers:
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: Street Photography Case

Postby surenj on Sat May 28, 2011 10:33 pm

Matt. K wrote:Why the bloody hell do people think they have rights over the light that bounces off them!!!

:rotfl2:
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Street Photography Case

Postby CraigVTR on Sun May 29, 2011 10:10 am

Seems simple to me. If you do not want to been seen in a public place stick a paper bag on your head. :)
Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride."
D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
User avatar
CraigVTR
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1243
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:09 pm
Location: Montville, Sunshine Coast, Queensland

Re: Street Photography Case

Postby surenj on Sun May 29, 2011 3:16 pm

CraigVTR wrote: If you do not want to been seen in a public place stick a paper bag on your head.

Or stay at home. :| I guess the issue here is whether you can setup flashes and photograph them. If you are allowed to photograph people in public places, then setting up flashes wouldn't be a problem in my mind; unless there were OHS issues at hand... :idea: Perhaps one could argue that an unexpected flash of light could cause visual problems and perhaps accidents etc. :roll:
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Street Photography Case

Postby CraigVTR on Sun May 29, 2011 4:27 pm

surenj wrote:
CraigVTR wrote: If you do not want to been seen in a public place stick a paper bag on your head.

Or stay at home. :| I guess the issue here is whether you can setup flashes and photograph them. If you are allowed to photograph people in public places, then setting up flashes wouldn't be a problem in my mind; unless there were OHS issues at hand... :idea: Perhaps one could argue that an unexpected flash of light could cause visual problems and perhaps accidents etc. :roll:


If we all stayed home there would be no one to photograph. :shock:

There are many sources where a flash of light could get in our eyes. Should we ban the sun from flashing through gaps in the cloud? :)
Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride."
D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
User avatar
CraigVTR
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1243
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:09 pm
Location: Montville, Sunshine Coast, Queensland

Re: Street Photography Case

Postby Reschsmooth on Sun May 29, 2011 6:18 pm

CraigVTR wrote:
surenj wrote:
CraigVTR wrote: If you do not want to been seen in a public place stick a paper bag on your head.

Or stay at home. :| I guess the issue here is whether you can setup flashes and photograph them. If you are allowed to photograph people in public places, then setting up flashes wouldn't be a problem in my mind; unless there were OHS issues at hand... :idea: Perhaps one could argue that an unexpected flash of light could cause visual problems and perhaps accidents etc. :roll:


If we all stayed home there would be no one to photograph. :shock:

There are many sources where a flash of light could get in our eyes. Should we ban the sun from flashing through gaps in the cloud? :)


Not a reasonable comparison. For one, the sunlit will typically be longer than 1/xxx ths of a second. For another, a reasonable person would not expect a flash of sunlight in a semi-enclosed area (as I understand the nature of the photographs). Thirdly, the strobeloght is man-made and therefore is controlled.

Generally, however, I am still in two minds of the ethics behind it. Is it legal? Generally yes. Should you seek permission or at least inform the subject afterwards? One would think that is the polite thing to do.

I personally don't like it when one's rights trounce all over common courtesy.
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Street Photography Case

Postby surenj on Sun May 29, 2011 7:21 pm

CraigVTR wrote: Should we ban the sun from flashing through gaps in the cloud?

CraigVTR wrote:If we all stayed home there would be no one to photograph.

Craig, I assume you are kidding.

Reschsmooth wrote:I personally don't like it when one's rights trounce all over common courtesy.

That's the basis of most ethics. If it feels funny or wrong, it most like is. One needs to exert extra care.
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Street Photography Case

Postby CraigVTR on Mon May 30, 2011 8:06 am

surenj wrote:
CraigVTR wrote: Should we ban the sun from flashing through gaps in the cloud?

CraigVTR wrote:If we all stayed home there would be no one to photograph.

Craig, I assume you are kidding.

Reschsmooth wrote:I personally don't like it when one's rights trounce all over common courtesy.

That's the basis of most ethics. If it feels funny or wrong, it most like is. One needs to exert extra care.


Yes Iam kidding.

But now serious.

If a person goes into a public space they should not expect to be treated the same as if they are in their private space. Courtesy should be extended to everyone and in this case could of been handled by an appropriate sign. However, I do not believe that an individuals rights, whilst they should be shown respect, are greater than the rights of the wider community.

The attitude that the individual rights get priority has seen the demise of live music venues, race circuits and Iam sure many other venues or interests. Will it extend to photography where one day you cannot take a city or urban shot because there are people in the background who's rights are being infringed? In todays society we have security cameras, news cameras, photo licenses/ID's. For a person to go through life in todays society and not expect that their image may be captured somewhare at some time is naive.

I wonder what the plantif would have done had the artist taken either the memory of the scene, or photograph, and then rendered the image by paint on canvas? Would he still sue for lots of money, which seems to be a great motivator, or is that just the cynic in me talking?
Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride."
D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
User avatar
CraigVTR
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1243
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:09 pm
Location: Montville, Sunshine Coast, Queensland

Re: Street Photography Case

Postby sirhc55 on Mon May 30, 2011 2:43 pm

Next we will have people complaining about traffic camera flashes capturing their craven (sic) images :wink:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Re: Street Photography Case

Postby who on Mon Jun 06, 2011 2:08 am

CraigVTR wrote:The attitude that the individual rights get priority has seen the demise of live music venues, race circuits and Iam sure many other venues or interests.


That certainly fits. Now, years ago, I had a girlfriend who lived with her parents, not that far from Lakeside Raceway (Qld).

And when an event was running, you'd generally hear screaming V8 supertaxis, all weekend, over probably a 5km distance......

Was never an issue, even though it was a noticeable sound level. Mind you, when cutting firewood, or clearing some of the crappy ti-tree on the acreage block, the old stihl made way more noise.

Or countless other activities 8)
Old D200+extras
who
Senior Member
 
Posts: 543
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:38 pm
Location: Ulverstone, TAS

Re: Street Photography Case

Postby monuis on Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:39 pm

hi thanks for your valuable information
Banned for spamming this website.
monuis
Newbie
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:27 pm


Return to General Discussion