biggerry wrote:Reschsmooth wrote:Interesting. Much has been said of the reduced traffic to this forum. However, a side effect is that the C&C is much more constructive rather than sycophantic "great shots."
gstark wrote:Which has always been our goal.
being only a relatively new member i am interested to hear your perspective on how this has developed and changed over the years here.
Gerry,
For me, the education aspect has always been a very large part of what I want this forum to be. We've had the challenges over time, and while it's noce to think that the prizes on offer were just for trimming, and likewise the pricing of equipment ordered through Poon, the reality of the situation is that it was those items that attracted a large part of the active membership.
For a further large part of the membership base, our lives have changed over years since the forum started as D70Users.com. Mine has changed very significantly: Leigh has moved out, I'm now an employee (vs self employed contractor), and I am much busier today than was the case five years ago. I know from talking with others that I'm not alone in that situation.
That said, we've always had a strong push towards realistic honest critique, a prohibition on flaming others (criticise the image, not the person) and of course the pursuit of this wonderful hobby that we share: photography.
We've been very fortunate to have members of the calibre of Matt K and Chris (sirhc55) to name just two, who are photographers with a very high level of experience, technical skill as well as artistic talent, and who are also very good communicators, and who also share the collective love of the hobby and the photographic image.
And the
moderators here, while largely doing not too much, are people in whom I am fortunate to have found: they enjoy my utmost respect and trust.
There have been times where there have been challenges - I don't (and I can only speak for myself here) like it when people post what I like to refer to as ego boosting images. There have been people who posted images showing where they had been, but that may be done within a number of contexts: I love it when that is done with a genuine intent of seeking true critique, as distinct from being posted with an attitude of "guess where I was last weekend?".
The former has always been very welcome and appreciated; the latter is difficult to address without pissing off the perpetrator.
And over time there have been discussions around the merit of genuine critique vs the "great shot" posts. Some members have expressed disappointment over the fact that their image may have had 50 views, and no comments. While I understand the disappointment that this must engender, I'm not happy with the alternate PoV that suggests that people should make those "great shot" posts just to satisfy that demand.
I think it's far better to have just one post that suggests ways to improve a shot than it might be to have any number of meaningless posts that do nothing to help the poster improve their technique, and that's why I have always been (and still remain) reluctant to impose any sort of quota or requirement upon people to make those sorts of posts.
I'll be honest and say that I would like to see more traffic, but I would prefer that to be honest traffic - traffic focused on the photography, rather than the side issues that come up. That said, I'm always open to see controversial discussions opened up here, and of course the good natured banter that I believe is an essential part of we have built.
Does that help? Does this answer your questions?