Some questions. No answers. Ah well maybe soon.
Some answers for you.
Yes Cam I have decided to go the D7000 route. I need two cameras again next Feb, so need to get one now so I am mostly over the learning curve by the time I actually NEED it. I have a friend who has been covetous of the D200, so I will give it to him when I get back. He has done me more than a few favours in the past so...
As Gary says, the Katz Eye is a replacement viewscreen for the camera. It has the traditional microprism and split prism in the centre to aid with manual focus. This was something I really missed when I moved to digital (and AF) While I mostly just AF, there are times I MF, and it is a great boon then. I find they do not get in the way at other times, but then I grew up with this technology. If you didn't you may find otherwise. Wink, if you ever get up to Sydney you are welcome to have a play. Or just walk into a store that has second hand film cameras & play with one
As for the metering shift, if it is there, I have never noticed. While sometimes the exposure seems a little wacky, it is nothing I haven't been able to explain by scene weighting. And certainly nothing that can't be corrected on a NEF in Post.I borrowed Cam's D300 for several months earlier in the year & used both cameras side by side. I have not detected any trend in exposure shift. They both exposed neutral scenes correctly, overexposed dark scenes and underexposed light scenes as you would expect.
I am not aware of any
modern camera that has "official" interchangeable view screens. There may be some, but almost certainly only top end
models. My F3 had this, but not my FM2 nor my SP-F. Still it was a very simple process to change over my D200.It took about 2 minutes, including summoning up the nerve to dive in where I am not supposed to.
Now back to the original question. Does anyone know if the optibrite treatment is worth the money given my mix of lenses?