Canon DSLR fails dampness test

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Canon DSLR fails dampness test

Postby Matt. K on Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:01 pm

Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Re: Canon DSLR fails dampness test

Postby phillipb on Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:20 pm

Funny how Canon gets the cudos for recovering the images when it should go to the memory card manufacturer who doesn't even get a mention.
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Re: Canon DSLR fails dampness test

Postby stubbsy on Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:13 pm

Interesting story. I just wonder if it's "viral-ness" is being kicked along by Google given this comment:
"an interesting comparison: I posted this on facebook early this morning to try my luck there - it received one 'like' - that's it (there's a reason I left)." Or maybe I'm just getting cynical in my old age.

Markus Google+ page has an update:
"Canon Canada contacted me and have offered to replace the owners 'severely weathered' Rebel XS - free of charge. SanDisk has also contacted me and will be providing us both with new SD Extreme III Pro imaging cards. My thanks to both for the kind gesture!"



Finally an aside on how sloppy journalists are.

Daily Mail says "a diver spotted it rusting away in the depths and rescued it..."

Engadget says "Canon EOS 1000D washes ashore" as it's headline with the body stating "Marcus Thompson, found the DSLR washed up near a wharf while on a diving job"

While Markus Thompson says on his Goolge+ page "found off the end of a wharf in Deep Bay, BC while I was diving"

A big 1/10 for Engadget I reckon - couldn't even get the name right
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Re: Canon DSLR fails dampness test

Postby aim54x on Mon Dec 05, 2011 10:44 pm

I read this...and thought....it cant be the only camera that has been lost into the ocean...

Nice of Canon to offer the owner a new camera....get on the publicity bandwagon!

Kudo's to Markus Thompson for going out of his way to return the images to the owner!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: Canon DSLR fails dampness test

Postby ATJ on Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:03 am

What struck me from this story is how absolutely trashy the Daily Mail is (re: the "FEMAIL TODAY" sidebar). The phone hacking that went on (and probably still goes on) is not at all surprising given the people that obviously buy this trash. The UK should be ashamed (as should much of Australia that also read/watch this crap).
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Re: Canon DSLR fails dampness test

Postby Reschsmooth on Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:29 am

ATJ wrote:What struck me from this story is how absolutely trashy the Daily Mail is (re: the "FEMAIL TODAY" sidebar). The phone hacking that went on (and probably still goes on) is not at all surprising given the people that obviously buy this trash. The UK should be ashamed (as should much of Australia that also read/watch this crap).


I feel a bit dirtier having reviewed that sidebar.

But, don't be surprised given Today Tonight and its ilk are consistently top raters. Count how many vicarious police and other 'reality' shows there are; consider the focus on 'celebrity', where such celebrity simply arises because someone videotaped themselves shagging someone else and then releasing the video; where 'celebrities' put their names to perfumes (because people will buy them), etcetera.
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Canon DSLR fails dampness test

Postby surenj on Tue Dec 06, 2011 12:02 pm

Amazing how the card survived though... :shock:
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Canon DSLR fails dampness test

Postby Matt. K on Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:48 pm

The card was wearing a lifejacket?
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra


Return to General Discussion