Filters..Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: Filters..
Here're the links: http://www.2filter.com/welcometo.html http://www.moose395.net/gear/81a.html http://www.2filter.com/faq/faq.html more to come!!!!!!!! Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
I was gunna say, pro photographers who have websites will usually have a page or three on filters and accesories. Birddog's listed Moose Peterson's site, Thom Hogan also has a bit to say about them: http://www.bythom.com/filters.htm
Personally, I recently bought a 2 stops ND to slow down the shutter for waterfalls, as the D70's ISO200 minimum can be a little restrictive in that regard. Most other traditional filter kits designed for film can be duplicated/emulated in Photoshop IMHO.
yeah, maybe...
True, and i agree with you, but there's still plenty of things you can't do after the photo has been taken, such as use a polariser to see 'into' water, or use a UV to reduce blue haze or use RGB filters to block/allow different star colours through etc...... There is still, and always will be, a place for post-processing in Photoshop though, even if you have used an effect filter. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
I tried taking a photo using a coffee filter in front of the lens. For some reason, it didn't seem to work all that well.
I'll have a word with my mechanic this week and grab an oil filter from him; see if thatworks any better. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
I tend to agree with Onyx....if you can do it in Photoshop then leave the filters off. I certainly don't agree with the guys who keep a polarizing filter on their camera all the time. It'll cost you 2 stops of light which means effectively you are restricting your D70 to 50 ISO! That's a hell of a price to pay for a bit of blue sky that can be tweaked in almost any raster based software program. The only use for those filters that I can think of is to cut through glass reflections or shoot into water...and that's a fairly rare occurence for most photographers. Also, paying $2000 for prime optics and then placing a $25 filterover the top of it is certainly worth another debate.
Just my opinion Regards
Matt. K
Trick/tip for cutting through distant landscapes haze - USM. Set a big radius, and low sharpening value. I bet ya didn't know USM did more than sharpen your edges huh?
Edit: See example - http://forum.d70users.com/viewtopic.php?t=440 There was recent thread on Nikonians.org, that a poll taken suggests 75% of users there did NOT advocate the use of "protection" filters, with the user base there is more pro-oriented. Most amateurs would have heard from one source or another to get a UV filter for protecting the lens. I practice the latter, with a Skylight 1B almost always attached.
For Kris, Re# Q about filterBirddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|