Filters..Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: Filters..
Here're the links: http://www.2filter.com/welcometo.html http://www.moose395.net/gear/81a.html http://www.2filter.com/faq/faq.html more to come!!!!!!!! Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
I was gunna say, pro photographers who have websites will usually have a page or three on filters and accesories. Birddog's listed Moose Peterson's site, Thom Hogan also has a bit to say about them: http://www.bythom.com/filters.htm
Personally, I recently bought a 2 stops ND to slow down the shutter for waterfalls, as the D70's ISO200 minimum can be a little restrictive in that regard. Most other traditional filter kits designed for film can be duplicated/emulated in Photoshop IMHO.
yeah, maybe...
True, and i agree with you, but there's still plenty of things you can't do after the photo has been taken, such as use a polariser to see 'into' water, or use a UV to reduce blue haze or use RGB filters to block/allow different star colours through etc...... There is still, and always will be, a place for post-processing in Photoshop though, even if you have used an effect filter. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
I tried taking a photo using a coffee filter in front of the lens. For some reason, it didn't seem to work all that well.
I'll have a word with my mechanic this week and grab an oil filter from him; see if thatworks any better. ![]() g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
I tend to agree with Onyx....if you can do it in Photoshop then leave the filters off. I certainly don't agree with the guys who keep a polarizing filter on their camera all the time. It'll cost you 2 stops of light which means effectively you are restricting your D70 to 50 ISO! That's a hell of a price to pay for a bit of blue sky that can be tweaked in almost any raster based software program. The only use for those filters that I can think of is to cut through glass reflections or shoot into water...and that's a fairly rare occurence for most photographers. Also, paying $2000 for prime optics and then placing a $25 filterover the top of it is certainly worth another debate.
Just my opinion Regards
Matt. K
Trick/tip for cutting through distant landscapes haze - USM. Set a big radius, and low sharpening value. I bet ya didn't know USM did more than sharpen your edges huh?
![]() Edit: See example - http://forum.d70users.com/viewtopic.php?t=440 There was recent thread on Nikonians.org, that a poll taken suggests 75% of users there did NOT advocate the use of "protection" filters, with the user base there is more pro-oriented. Most amateurs would have heard from one source or another to get a UV filter for protecting the lens. I practice the latter, with a Skylight 1B almost always attached.
For Kris, Re# Q about filterBirddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|