Page 1 of 1

Been asked before however...

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 7:58 pm
by Geoff
Hi All,
My current monitor is getting worse by the hour it seems, blurry almost beyond recognition! I knwo this as I just went from one monitor to another in a different room and the difference was amazing. A fellow D70 guru also commented on this clarity (or lack there of) of images and text on my current screen (looks towards JordanP)..so...my question is, it's time for a new monitor. I have a budget of ABOUT $500 (hopefully a bit less), I'd LOVE a flat screen if possible but don't know much about monitors these days and would very much appreciate input by some local resident experts. I watch with great anticipation. PS - I'd like either 17" or 19".

Geoff 8)

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:03 pm
by MHD
I saw an LCD in a cagtaloge (domayne I think) for 399 today... (could be wrong though)

I will check

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:05 pm
by MHD
go here
http://www.cougar.com.au/
type lcd into the search

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:07 pm
by gstark
Geoff, you shjould be able to pick up a 17" LCD for around $360.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:11 pm
by gstark
MHD wrote:go here
http://www.cougar.com.au/
type lcd into the search


LG make a similar one to the Benq mentioned on that site, but it's faster and cheaper; I bought two this afternoon for $350 each!

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:31 pm
by Geoff
Hey thanx guys, I am hoping to get one tomorrow...Gary - do u have a model no. of yours (LG) and the 19" equivalent? :)


Geoff.
I'm excited already.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:33 pm
by gstark
Mine's an L1750.

Don't know, but I guess 1950 for the 19"?

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:34 pm
by Geoff
MHD wrote:go here
http://www.cougar.com.au/
type lcd into the search


Thanx Scott - quite helpful :)
Settling into BH well :)

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:07 pm
by shutterbug
Hi Geoff,

Get a Mitsubishi 19" CRT, cheap and very good colour, also get a matrox video card, great for 2D work (PS) if you are not into games.

vl

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:14 pm
by birddog114
Geoff,
I follow this thread from the beginning, I still prefer the CRT for PS or PP.
Cheap LCD won't help, if you want a good LCD screen, it's costly or at least you get the one with 8ms not 12 or 25ms

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:17 pm
by shutterbug
Make sure you get a good graphics card, most people forget about this.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:21 pm
by gstark
Birddog114 wrote: if you want a good LCD screen, it's costly or at least you get the one with 8ms not 12 or 25ms


The LG's I've bought are 8ms.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:25 pm
by birddog114
Yes, I noticed that model too, but it's the lower end one
LG has two other model in 17":
LGE L1780Q
LGE L193ST

But sure, LCD can't beat CRT in PP that why I still use and prefer my Mitsubishi 21" CRT

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:28 pm
by shutterbug

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
by birddog114


shutterbug,
He has just got the "approval" to buy the monitor :lol: , cos he can justified it right now. Wait till he got the monitor and he next complaint is the existing video card then he'll submit a request for a new video card :lol:

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:34 pm
by Geoff
Birddog114 wrote:Geoff,
I follow this thread from the beginning, I still prefer the CRT for PS or PP.
Cheap LCD won't help, if you want a good LCD screen, it's costly or at least you get the one with 8ms not 12 or 25ms


I'm unaware of what this response time is, I'm currently looking at the LG 1910S for $568 (19") with 12MS. Is this unacceptable for PS work etc? Now I'm really confused LCD/CRT??! I just want a nice looking (preferably thin) functional monitor that's CRISP


:wink:

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:34 pm
by shutterbug
:roll: :lol: :roll: :lol:

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:37 pm
by birddog114
Geoff wrote:
Birddog114 wrote:Geoff,
I follow this thread from the beginning, I still prefer the CRT for PS or PP.
Cheap LCD won't help, if you want a good LCD screen, it's costly or at least you get the one with 8ms not 12 or 25ms


I'm unaware of what this response time is, I'm currently looking at the LG 1910S for $568 (19") with 12MS. Is this unacceptable for PS work etc? Now I'm really confused LCD/CRT??! I just want a nice looking (preferably thin) functional monitor that's CRISP


:wink:


If you want thing right with your photos and CRISP, only CRT not LCD.
CRT is not thin.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:46 pm
by Geoff
Birddog114 wrote:
Geoff wrote:
Birddog114 wrote:Geoff,
I follow this thread from the beginning, I still prefer the CRT for PS or PP.
Cheap LCD won't help, if you want a good LCD screen, it's costly or at least you get the one with 8ms not 12 or 25ms


I'm unaware of what this response time is, I'm currently looking at the LG 1910S for $568 (19") with 12MS. Is this unacceptable for PS work etc? Now I'm really confused LCD/CRT??! I just want a nice looking (preferably thin) functional monitor that's CRISP


:wink:


If you want thing right with your photos and CRISP, only CRT not LCD.
CRT is not thin.


Yup - I know CRT ain't thin...can u recommend a good 19" CRT then birdy?

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:47 pm
by gstark
Birddog114 wrote:But sure, LCD can't beat CRT in PP that why I still use and prefer my Mitsubishi 21" CRT


I won't disagree there, but my workarea precludes the use of a CRT. The LG is sitting very nicely next to the old 15" Mitsubishi LCD (I'm now running dual screens) and it's interesting to see the differences in colour between the two.

And my Colorvison Spider doesn't support dual monitor operation. :(

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:48 pm
by shutterbug
CRT, go for the Mitsubishi 19" same tube as NEC and Leica (spelling)

http://umart.net/au/product_info.php?cPath=45_209&products_id=1564

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:49 pm
by birddog114
MITSUBISHI 19" FLAT SCREEN CRT-997FD

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:50 pm
by birddog114
shutterbug wrote:CRT, go for the Mitsubishi 19" same tube as NEC and Leica (spelling)

http://umart.net/au/product_info.php?cPath=45_209&products_id=1564


This 93 model is discontinued since Nov 2004, johndec ordered one in January but I could not get for him. It's old fashion.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 10:08 pm
by Nnnnsic
As a video card junkie, I would personally not recommend a Matrox card unless you're a video editor.

A video editor who also happens to be a Matrox enthusiast at that.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 10:11 pm
by Geoff
Thanx all for your help - I have some homework to do :) but I think the CRT is the best way to go (and much better for the pocket!!) :)

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 10:11 pm
by birddog114
Nnnnsic wrote:As a video card junkie, I would personally not recommend a Matrox card unless you're a video editor.

A video editor who also happens to be a Matrox enthusiast at that.


Leigh,
please hold the talk about the video card, geoff is not settled on the monitor yet! Give him few hours for his breath :lol: :roll: after he made a decision on the monitor, then we will talk about the video card.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 10:16 pm
by birddog114
And the new mobo, new Hdd with larger size etc...... :lol: :lol: :lol:

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 10:27 pm
by georgie
Birddog114 wrote:MITSUBISHI 19" FLAT SCREEN CRT-997FD


Cworld have it for $356 at the moment - certainly will help with the under $500 budget.

http://www.cworld.com.au

Hold the phone - Umart have it for $289 - gee mine isn't even broken but I might get one of these.

http://www.umart.com.au/newindex2.phtml?bid=2

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:17 am
by Geoff
Hehehe to birdy and the graphics card, I currently have a radeon 9600 or something, it seems ok!

I think I have chosen the flatscreen LG T910B (http://au.lge.com/md/product/prodcategorylist.do?actType=detail&currPage=1&categoryId=0000060502&parentCategoryId=0000000605&categoryLevel=4&productId=1100000430&productImage=&selectModel=1100000430

Found it for $342! Now I have to wait until the morning to see if they have it in stock! :)

Thanx again everyone!

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:27 am
by sirhc55
Geoff just check georie’s suggestion and look at Umart - they have that model for $319.00 :wink:

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:37 am
by Geoff
Awesome!! Now I can't for the life of me see where I can pick it up from?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 1:32 am
by Nnnnsic
I'd take the LG over the Mitsubishi... the placement of the parts in Mitsubishi monitors seems to allow for two lines of pixels to go missing.

I know Birddog's has it that way and the Sony monitors I use at work (and for those not aware, a Sony Trinitron monitor is just a Mitsubishi) have the exact same line of pixels missing.

Two lines of pixels, about an equal distance from the top and bottom of the monitor.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 3:21 am
by Onyx
Geoff, I'd suggest going to Hardly Normal or other retail places and take a look for yourself at the differences between monitors before you buy. Specs may look good on paper (eg. I like how everone fell into the fallacy of LCD response times: fast = better), and user recommendations (even those you trust are inherently biased) - much of your computing experience is viewed through the monitor, make sure you get one that suits you and that you're happy with.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 7:35 am
by birddog114
Geoff wrote:Hehehe to birdy and the graphics card, I currently have a radeon 9600 or something, it seems ok!

I think I have chosen the flatscreen LG T910B (http://au.lge.com/md/product/prodcategorylist.do?actType=detail&currPage=1&categoryId=0000060502&parentCategoryId=0000000605&categoryLevel=4&productId=1100000430&productImage=&selectModel=1100000430

Found it for $342! Now I have to wait until the morning to see if they have it in stock! :)

Thanx again everyone!


Geoff,
I haven't brought up the video card update to your lust. Shutterbug and Leigh recommended them to you and I ask them to put it on hold until you have the new monitor :wink:

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 9:31 am
by -=Monty=-
I would deffiently recomend an LCD. I find them a lot clearer and more colourful than CRT's.

You can pick up a benq 19" 12ms monitor for $530.

Or you could buy quite a few 19" monitors for under $500 that have a 25ms response time.

Response time only matters when gaming. It is how fast pixels can change from one colour to another, and in 2d, you are not going to notice the difference between 25ms and 8ms.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 9:36 am
by birddog114
Monty,
Geoff has the budget to spend on the monitor! :wink:

And on CRT! have you had a chance to compare one photos on two monitors LCD & CRT as Mitsubishi or LGE or Samsung at the same time?
To do work on photos or PS or PP, CRT is recommended and it's cheaper than the LCD, though it's bulky and look not mordern design as LCD.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 9:58 am
by johndec
Birddog114 wrote:
shutterbug wrote:CRT, go for the Mitsubishi 19" same tube as NEC and Leica (spelling)

http://umart.net/au/product_info.php?cPath=45_209&products_id=1564


This 93 model is discontinued since Nov 2004, johndec ordered one in January but I could not get for him. It's old fashion.


Geoff,
I ended up getting the 997FD off Birdy and I'm very happy with it. :D

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 11:44 am
by stubbsy
Nnnnsic wrote:I'd take the LG over the Mitsubishi... the placement of the parts in Mitsubishi monitors seems to allow for two lines of pixels to go missing.

I know Birddog's has it that way and the Sony monitors I use at work (and for those not aware, a Sony Trinitron monitor is just a Mitsubishi) have the exact same line of pixels missing.

Two lines of pixels, about an equal distance from the top and bottom of the monitor.

Leigh

The 2 pixels thing is actually a ghost image of two stabilising wires that are in the path of the electrons being fired at the screen. They slightly deflect the beam, hence the line. These are a feature of all trinitron monitors and TVs. Basically the wires stop the frame from being distorted as I understand it. I never notice them unless I go looking.

I remember getting my first Macintosh with a Trinitron monitor and taking the "defective" monitor back when I noticed the lines only to be told it was a "feature".

Despite the lines, I much prefer Trinitron monitors as I find them sharper and flatter than other monitors. Sony until recently had a patent on the technology and so only Sony sold them. Now other manufacturers also make and sell them.

And Geoff, my 2 cents is I'm glad you've decided on a CRT rather than an LCD. They may not have the current wow factor, but for photo work they still beat LCDs.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:26 pm
by Nnnnsic
That "feature" would irritate me to no end. I'll stick with my Philips, thank you. :)

Monty, LCD's by no means are any where near as good... or at least as "true" as a CRT will be when it comes down to PS/PP work.

That said, yes... most LCD's are easier to read off of than a CRT.
It helps to have a light-panel behind the screen.

And Birdy... he's got some form of a 9600 gpu... you'd be pretty hard-pressed to tell him that he needs anything else if he isn't playing games, working with 3d applications, or editing video. :)

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:31 pm
by birddog114
Nnnnsic wrote:That "feature" would irritate me to no end. I'll stick with my Philips, thank you. :)

Monty, LCD's by no means are any where near as good... or at least as "true" as a CRT will be when it comes down to PS/PP work.

That said, yes... most LCD's are easier to read off of than a CRT.
It helps to have a light-panel behind the screen.

And Birdy... he's got some form of a 9600 gpu... you'd be pretty hard-pressed to tell him that he needs anything else if he isn't playing games, working with 3d applications, or editing video. :)


Leigh,
Please note: I have never recommend him to u/g his video card cos I didn't know what he got :?: Shutterbug and you brought it on first and I asked both of you put it on hold until he got his new montor. :wink:
And I will never ask people to u/g anything from their inventory unless they seriously asked me for.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:37 pm
by Nnnnsic
Fair enough. :)

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 2:46 pm
by Geoff
Again, a huge thank you to everyone involved in this thread for your input. I just purchased the LG Flatron CRT 19" T910B for a crazy $270 - couldn't be happier. Took a bit of a gamble, the shop wasn't answering my calls at all, so I drove nearly 40km's to see if they had it in stock, I was luck! :) I feel like I have new eyes :). Wooohooo! One happy camper! A special thanx to Leigh and Gary for putting me onto fluidtek here in Sydney...unbeatable prices http://www.fluidtek.com.au (but don't expect them to answer the phone if u call) :)


Geoff.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 3:12 pm
by shutterbug
That is sooo cheap...what a bargain :D

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 3:17 pm
by Geoff
shutterbug wrote:That is sooo cheap...what a bargain :D


I was very happy with the price shutterbug yeah, he had at least one more in the shop, I'm soo happy..I now know how crappy my other monitor was...just hoping I have enough room in the wheely bin for it hehe :)


Geoff.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 3:21 pm
by Geoff
Nnnnsic wrote:That "feature" would irritate me to no end. I'll stick with my Philips, thank you. :)

Monty, LCD's by no means are any where near as good... or at least as "true" as a CRT will be when it comes down to PS/PP work.

That said, yes... most LCD's are easier to read off of than a CRT.
It helps to have a light-panel behind the screen.

And Birdy... he's got some form of a 9600 gpu... you'd be pretty hard-pressed to tell him that he needs anything else if he isn't playing games, working with 3d applications, or editing video. :)


I have a radeon 9800 XXL graphics card, I assume this is good?! :)

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 3:56 pm
by shutterbug
[quote="Geoff
I have a radeon 9800 XXL graphics card, I assume this is good?! :)[/quote]

It should be fine, but if you get a chance, get a matrox card, even an older model on ebay...cheap. The diff is huge, like wearing glasses and not wearing glasses.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 5:03 pm
by MCWB
Geoff wrote:unbeatable prices http://www.fluidtek.com.au (but don't expect them to answer the phone if u call) :)

Yup, you nailed it. Fluidtek are great... until you have to RMA something, at which time it becomes an almighty pain in the arse trying to even contact them to find out about. Cheap prices but zero service. I am now happy to shop elsewhere, pay a bit more, but know if something does go wrong, I'm not going to have to spend a lot of my own time chasing up after people who couldn't care less.