Sigma 18-35 F1.8

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Sigma 18-35 F1.8

Postby ozimax on Mon Feb 22, 2016 11:03 am

After a two week long relationship with the Panasonic GH4, I decided there was too much to learn about video, so I on-sold it to a fellow photographer.

I'm still shooting happily with my Fuji XT-1/18-55 combo and the Canon 7Dii/100-400 combo. I would like to add a Canon-mount lens to the 7Dii and was thinking of the designed-for-crop-sensor Sigma 18-35, especially for astrophotography. Does anyone have any experience with this lens? It is far better priced than the Canon 16-35 F4, although it doesn't have IS or weather sealing.

Any comments/opinions appreciated.

Ozi.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Re: Sigma 18-35 F1.8

Postby zafra52 on Mon Feb 22, 2016 11:24 am

I'd love to advise, but your question is way off my league. But, Id love to see the results with either lens.
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Sigma 18-35 F1.8

Postby ozimax on Sat Mar 12, 2016 9:23 am

Further to my Sigma lens' idea, I purchased the 18-35 F1.8. To summarize in one word? Dreadful. It's focussing was so bad that I called Camerapro, and sent it back for a refund, which was duly completed.

I understand that many lenses need calibrating, including Canon L series, but they should be at least generally usable within reasonable limits. At 18mm and wide open (which is why you buy a lens such as this), it front-focussed by about 18". Not acceptable in my humble estimation. YMMV. Should I have purchased the Sigma lens dock at $89? I think Sigma should include one with every ART series lens. I don't buy a car expecting to then purchase engine diagnostic tools to get it to run smoothly.

As an aside, I found the people at Camerapro (Brisbane) very professional to deal with. They understood my problem and had it resolved quickly at no cost to me, including reimbursement of return postage. Thoroughly recommended.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Re: Sigma 18-35 F1.8

Postby gstark on Sat Mar 12, 2016 10:24 am

Brings us back to my well worn nickname for Sigma glass.

It's great that you had such good support from CamerPro
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Sigma 18-35 F1.8

Postby ozimax on Sun Mar 13, 2016 5:55 pm

gstark wrote:Brings us back to my well worn nickname for Sigma glass.

It's great that you had such good support from CamerPro


Very impressed with Camerapro. I usually try and buy my gear from my local Camera House franchise. Very decent people and knowledgeable, but occasionally the online price is too good to pass up.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW


Return to General Discussion