Focal length comparison

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Focal length comparison

Postby Glen on Tue May 10, 2005 1:28 pm

Both my mother and Big Lens Kipper asked about focal length comparisons yesterday, thought it may interest others and all courtesy of Canon. How nice :wink:

http://consumer.usa.canon.com/app/html/ ... ength.html
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby the foto fanatic on Tue May 10, 2005 1:57 pm

A graphic illustration, Glen BTW, what were you doing trawling the Canon site? :?:
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby Glen on Tue May 10, 2005 2:06 pm

Trevor, my 69 yr old mum, who specified 6-8mp and a focal range of 35-200 on the Coolpix I just got for her, then revealed she didn't know what that meant! Kipper also asked about a comparison, so Googled and that came up.
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby kipper on Tue May 10, 2005 9:28 pm

Ok, go to 300MM on that website (I currently have 340MM with 70-200 + 1.7TC). Pretty little Super Fairy Wren, and all the other birds I photo are about the size of the triangle (sometimes a tad smaller depending on how far away I am) above the circle. Now flick to 600 and 1200. This is what I'd achieve with a 600MM and a 600MM + TC :)
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK


Return to General Discussion