Page 1 of 1

How many members mate in public?

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:15 am
by Glen
Heard on the weekend a few members have a secret mate in public interest in which they have quite some talent. Just wondering how many members mate in public or have pictures of members singing mate in public?

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:31 am
by wile_E
I use to - until recent noise polution legislation meant that I'll now be breaking the law if I pick up a mic with the intention of breaking into song... :lol: :lol:

EDIT: Oookay... this seems to have changed - with the word "mate in public" replaced with the word "Mate"... Wuh da funk?!

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 12:21 pm
by Link
Hum... Doing both photography and mate in public would require a tremendous amount of self-control! :shock: I associate mate in public with large consumption of alcohol (hence the ~~melodious~~ result), but the result could be visually interesting (artistic blur :!: ).

Link.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 1:25 pm
by sirhc55
The interesting point about this topic Glen is the members who were into the sing along - surprised me :wink: :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol:

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 1:31 pm
by birddog114
Another interesting part also, the D70user, who plays guitar and now who's doing karoke, I can see we have lot of talents on this board, may we expand these to our AW nights :wink:

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 1:41 pm
by Glen
Birddy, some real talent may emerge on the AA nights :wink:

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:12 pm
by MCWB
My other half likes it, and I've been known to be dragged along. :oops: :lol: If people are interested, we went to a place on Pitt St with a group of friends for her birthday, and for a private VIP (!) room with BYO grog it was $180 for 2 hours, pretty decent if you have a large group!

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:15 pm
by gstark
MCWB wrote:My other half likes it, and I've been known to be dragged along. :oops: :lol: If people are interested, we went to a place on Pitt St with a group of friends for her birthday, and for a private VIP (!) room with BYO grog it was $180 for 2 hours, pretty decent if you have a large group!


Evil!

Evil!

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:20 pm
by MCWB
 LOL, word filters are fun, my post is quite amusing now! :lol: :lol: :lol:

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:26 pm
by gstark
Trent,

:)

evil hides in a mic

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:35 pm
by redline
the last time i went for a night in the gutter was about 3 years ago.
the hollywood club where my chinese friends decided to go to have fun.
i think it was about 250 for a private room and 250 in credit for food and grog.
by 4am we got evicted after one of the guys started vomitting and slipping into unconscious due to his drunkness. anyway i ended up having to help carry is "dead" body all over the city streets looking for an all nighter for some coffee. also got stopped by cops aswell they ask us to go straight home by taxi, which wasn't possible in his condition and that trains wouldn't be back on until 6-7ish, what a nice a night in the gutter experince.
i passed on every occasion they ask me out again.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:17 pm
by Glen
Word filter works well, Trent your post fits right in and Redline remind me never to go to mate in public with you :wink:

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:19 pm
by birddog114
Does anyone want to sing along on the AW?

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:40 pm
by MHD
reading this thread makes me feel drunk... very drunk.... I need a few (dozen) beers to understand this methinks...

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:43 pm
by Greg B
The strangest thing about when people mate in public in public is the weird noises they make.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:58 pm
by birddog114
Greg B wrote:The strangest thing about when people mate in public in public is the weird noises they make.


But the "artist" showed full streght of his hidden talent :wink: and enjoyed!

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 4:32 pm
by leek
After all this teasing, is someone actually going to publish the photo of one of our prominent members doing it and the expression on his face as he reached the climax???

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 4:34 pm
by birddog114
calling stubbsy over!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 4:43 pm
by MHD
meet meet

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 4:44 pm
by MHD
I'm very confused... has some word in the word filter been replaced
shoot
canon
mhhh

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 4:47 pm
by gstark
Not yet, Scott. :)

But the output from the word filters gets carried across into the quoted section, and that only adds to the fun.

Er, I mean mayhem.

:)

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 4:50 pm
by gstark
Birddog114 wrote:
Greg B wrote:The strangest thing about when people mate in public in public is the weird noises they make.


But the "artist" showed full streght of his hidden talent :wink: and enjoyed!


As a person who takes his music very seriously, and is firmly of the opinion that there is no place in public society for this type of activity, I can honestly say that, based upon the evidence presented last Saturday, the hidden "talents" continue to remain thusly so: hidden.

Out, damned spot, out! (The bloody dog keeps getting in the way. :) )

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 9:41 pm
by Matt. K
Personally, I have always found karioke to be a purile, offensive, lower cast act. It should be avoided at all costs by anyone who has a skeric of self pride and dignity.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 9:44 pm
by leek
Finally :-) :-)

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 9:44 pm
by birddog114
To be continued :lol: :lol:

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 10:12 pm
by stubbsy
Guys I've kept quiet on this since I don't have a model release yet. I'm awaiting a response. :wink:

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 10:13 pm
by stubbsy
MHD wrote:I'm very confused... has some word in the word filter been replaced
shoot
canon
mhhh

Scott mate is what the word filter is doing to KARA0K3 (that Japanese singing artform we love to hate)

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 10:13 pm
by PiroStitch
Matt. K wrote:Personally, I have always found karioke to be a purile, offensive, lower cast act. It should be avoided at all costs by anyone who has a skeric of self pride and dignity.


That's why you rock up to pub open stage nights with a guitar ;)

PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 10:24 pm
by leek
stubbsy wrote:Guys I've kept quiet on this since I don't have a model release yet. I'm awaiting a response. :wink:


Stubbsy, I thought that you were familiar with the law in NSW - you don't need a model release if it is for non-commercial purposes...

And in the words of one of our illustrious members: What are you taking a photo of? Anything I like it's a free country!!!!!!

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:36 am
by birddog114
Peter,
I'm sure the models are happy for you to post few excellent pics of them.
They're the men of the night! That how we enjoyed their talents.

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:30 am
by Deano
For the simpletons among us (me included) can someone please explain the word filter?

Cheers
Dean

I love my mate in public...

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:31 am
by Deano
Ahhh. I think I understand now. So now the question is why?

Cheers
Dean

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:32 am
by Greg B
Dean, it just exchanges one nominated word with another word or phrase. Our evil Administrator enjoys messing with our heads. If you enter mate in public (k a r a o k e) the post will show "mate in public"

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 10:08 am
by stubbsy
Better late than never. Below is a shot of a certain forum administrator in mate in public (KARA0KE) mode. Either that or Leigh is about to swallow the microphone :lol:

Image

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 10:33 am
by gstark
Deano wrote:For the simpletons among us (me included) can someone please explain the word filter?ilj


Dean,

Its purpose is to provide censorship on boards such as this, so that if you entered a word that I deemed offensive, I could have the software automatically suppress that word and replace it with another.

I don't, however, believe in traditional censorship, and thus I find very few words, in the normal course of the day, offensive, and thus the word filter facility here goes largley unused.

Now, combine that fact with the fact that I do consider K araoke to be a highly offensive pasttime (I'm actually quite serious about that, and likewise this bullshit stuff we get thrown at us that some might call "reality tv") and add to that mix my rather warped sense of humour, and we end up with a(nother) playgound for me.

Such is life.

Quick trivia quiz : why is that quote important today?

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 7:58 pm
by Willy wombat
I just read through this post from start to finish and it was hillarious.

PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 1:44 am
by Nnnnsic
I think I was going to give the microphone a blow job, but it rejected and just asked me to yell at it for a while. :lol:

PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:16 am
by stubbsy
Nnnnsic wrote:I think I was going to give the microphone a blow job, but it rejected and just asked me to yell at it for a while. :lol:

Leigh

I was going to make a similar comment but decided to be tasteful :roll:

PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:24 am
by leek
Peter,
That wasn't the photo I was thinking of from that evening... Didn't you get some earlier shots of another prominent member singing with his wife???