Page 1 of 1

Nikon 80-200mm & TC 14E on my D70 ?

PostPosted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:57 pm
by mic
Hello to all,

Can you please give some advise on this combo.
A 80-200mm with a TC 14E

Does this work well ?
Does this make the 200 a 300 because of the 1.5 crop factor on D70 ?
and does this make it a 420 with the 1.4 TC ?

Or doesn't it work like that ?

Thanks,

Mic.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 7:58 pm
by birddog114
Yes, the TC-14EII will work very well with your 80-200 AFS/ 2.8
And the end of 200 will become 300 on all the Nikon DSLR (1.5 crop).
And with TC-14EII on the 80-200 and DSLR will become 420.

I don't have the 80-200 but I have 70-200/ AFS/ 2.8/ VR and have all the TC-14EII anf the TC-20EII

PostPosted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 8:03 pm
by gooseberry
Just to add on to Birddog14's post... Is your 80-200 the AF-S or the AF-D version ? The Nikon TC-14EII will only work with AF-S lenses (without modification). If you have the AF-D version of the 80-200mm, you'll have to get a third party TC (Kenko Pro series etc).

PostPosted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 8:50 pm
by birddog114
gooseberry wrote:Just to add on to Birddog14's post... Is your 80-200 the AF-S or the AF-D version ? The Nikon TC-14EII will only work with AF-S lenses (without modification). If you have the AF-D version of the 80-200mm, you'll have to get a third party TC (Kenko Pro series etc).


Yeah! I noticed that too! if the 80-200 is not the AFS version then nothing we can do about it.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 11:00 pm
by mic
Thanks guys for that,

I'm still doing my groundwork before purchasing, I'd love the 70-200 VR but for the $$$ I thought this might be the next best thing.

Thanks,

Mic.

PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 7:42 pm
by Kristine
Sorry, to "hijack" the thread, but what tele-converter would be best suited to the Nikon 70-300mm "G" lens (if this is possible and is it worth it)?

PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 7:51 pm
by Glen
it's probably not the first lens you would pick for the teleconverter Kristine, but if you did the 1.4 is recognised as the sharpest (though new would cost more than the lens!)

PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 7:54 pm
by birddog114
Glen wrote:it's probably not the first lens you would pick for the teleconverter Kristine, but if you did the 1.4 is recognised as the sharpest (though new would cost more than the lens!)


Yes the new TC14EII cost around AU$700.00 from any reseller (Maxwell stock), grey import cheaper. I paid year ago $850.00.

PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 8:49 pm
by Kristine
it's probably not the first lens you would pick for the teleconverter Kristine, but if you did the 1.4 is recognised as the sharpest (though new would cost more than the lens!)


I just had a look at pricing - not cheap...Maybe I should have just looked this up before I asked the question....Oh well, I do plan on getting the 70-200 VR for my birthday (if my hubby is generous enough) in the next 6-8 weeks...

Yes the new TC14EII cost around AU$700.00 from any reseller (Maxwell stock), grey import cheaper. I paid year ago $850.00.


I may see if Poon can do me a deal on this, since I have placed two orders with him in the last week.

Cheers
Kristine

PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 8:52 pm
by xerubus
have you thought about the sigma 70-200 f2.8 hsm with the sigma 2x apo? full autofocus and from what i've seen the results are still very sharp..

cheers

PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 8:59 pm
by Kristine
have you thought about the sigma 70-200 f2.8 hsm with the sigma 2x apo? full autofocus and from what i've seen the results are still very sharp..


Hi xerubus

Thanks for the suggestion. I had only looked at getting the Nikon, and decided on that because of how excellent everyone agrees it is. I only have Nikon lenses, which is another reason I went straight for this lens.

I will have to have a look at the Sigma - sounds promising. Hopefully I will be able to find some pics on the Internet that have been taken with the Sigma lens.

Cheers
Kristine

PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 9:07 pm
by xerubus
I am a big fan of nikon lenses.. however sometimes I go for other brands.. usually persuaded by $.

here's a link of sigma 70-200 shots... should be some in there with 2x.

http://search.pbase.com/search?q=sigma+ ... hotos&c=sp

hope this helps...

cheers

PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 9:08 pm
by Glen
Kristine, the 1.4 tele would mate fantastically with your upcoming 70-200, Birddog has that combo, I have seen sample photos, very good





ps Mr Poon may sell the Sigma also

PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 9:11 pm
by birddog114
Hi xerubus,
I had the Sigma 70-200 for a few days, swapped with my BIL, it's a good lens but lack of VR that what I what I always need cos shooting in many events that not allowed tripod with no flash, wide open under natural lights, and I used to run around to hunt photos, not stationed, so the Nikon 70-200VR suits my style of shooting apart from that it's Nikon and it's a gem.