bizarre question on cooled nikon CCD
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:49 pm
I had an interesting talk with a sales rep that sells nikon CCD for microscopy. She was telling me that a CCD camera that is cooled is much better for fluorescence microscopy (think green/red glowing cells on black background) since there is less thermal noise and hot pixels.
An ordinary CCD from nikon costs $3000, the cool edition is significantly more expensive. The cooler the CCD gets, the more expensive. ie $17 000 for the mid range.
Does anyone know if taking photos at zero degree's help in terms of noise? And how true is this thermal noise and hot pixel thing when it comes to temperature?
Insights would be more than appreciated. btw nikon makes great scopes and optics, its like the gold standard in science. Crap analysis software though.
An ordinary CCD from nikon costs $3000, the cool edition is significantly more expensive. The cooler the CCD gets, the more expensive. ie $17 000 for the mid range.
Does anyone know if taking photos at zero degree's help in terms of noise? And how true is this thermal noise and hot pixel thing when it comes to temperature?
Insights would be more than appreciated. btw nikon makes great scopes and optics, its like the gold standard in science. Crap analysis software though.