Lens Debate...Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Lens Debate...Well, I'm ready to buy some high quality, medium telephoto zoom glass.
The options are as follows...please, I would like your input... Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 HSM IF APO (New) Nikon 80-200 f/2.8 I believe it's AF-S, IF and DX??? (Used) They're going to be right around the same price -- between 500 and 700 -- the guy that is selling the 80-200 is not 100% sure he wants to sell it, and I'm not 100% sure I want to buy it -- is it a lot better than the newer Sigma? Of course the Sigma would come with a warranty as well (could be worth the extra price you know?) -- the 80-200, I'm sure is working properly, he's a pretty good friend of mine and I trust him. Thanks for the input. Dave D70 | Nikkor 18-70 | Nikkor 80-200 f/2.8D ED | Nikkor 85 1.8D | Nikkor 50 1.8D | SB-600
I'd buy the Nikon. It won't be DX, and they're a very well respected lens.
g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Lens Debate...
The 80-200 has three versions: ver. 1 Push & pull with AF without collar ver.2 2 rings and AF-D with collar ver.3 2 rings with collar and AF-S No such of Nikkor 80-200 in DX format. Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
I would buy the Nikon if AFS, Sigma if not. Where are you situated, the US? $700Aus is very very cheap for the Sigma
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
Yeah, I'm in the US. I believe he said AF-S -- I emailed him again, because I left my phone at work with his number in it. hrmm...well, still not sure what to do -- I know I wouldn't like messing with some push/pull lens, that seems odd...so if it's that, it's definately out.
Either way though, the AF-D and AF-S will communicate focal length with the camera, correct? D70 | Nikkor 18-70 | Nikkor 80-200 f/2.8D ED | Nikkor 85 1.8D | Nikkor 50 1.8D | SB-600
Yes, they're! Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Re: Lens Debate...
i thought there were 2 versions of the Push & pull with AF without collar one which takes lenses hood and ones which don't Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
As far as I've seen and known they can both take lens hood but lens hood is an option, I've tried to put a lens hood of the 80-200 AF-D and it worked.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
my push-pull can't take hoods but the other photog i meet at a shoot can.
i only paid 300$ for mine anywho. Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
Betcha it can. Does it take filters? g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
it use to until good'ol butter fingers dropped it.
but i was referring to the fact that some push-pull models could share the same lenses hood as the 2-ring versions. Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
Ahhhhh .....
The old "bent filter ring" syndrome. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|