Lens Debate...

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Lens Debate...

Postby deapee on Thu Jul 21, 2005 2:38 pm

Well, I'm ready to buy some high quality, medium telephoto zoom glass.

The options are as follows...please, I would like your input...

Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 HSM IF APO (New)

Nikon 80-200 f/2.8 I believe it's AF-S, IF and DX??? (Used)

They're going to be right around the same price -- between 500 and 700 -- the guy that is selling the 80-200 is not 100% sure he wants to sell it, and I'm not 100% sure I want to buy it -- is it a lot better than the newer Sigma?

Of course the Sigma would come with a warranty as well (could be worth the extra price you know?) -- the 80-200, I'm sure is working properly, he's a pretty good friend of mine and I trust him.

Thanks for the input.

Dave
D70 | Nikkor 18-70 | Nikkor 80-200 f/2.8D ED | Nikkor 85 1.8D | Nikkor 50 1.8D | SB-600
User avatar
deapee
Newbie
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2005 9:17 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Postby gstark on Thu Jul 21, 2005 2:41 pm

I'd buy the Nikon. It won't be DX, and they're a very well respected lens.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby WadeM on Thu Jul 21, 2005 2:45 pm

I'm with Mr gstark on this one too!

--Wade
WadeM
Member
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 10:36 pm
Location: .syd.au.

Re: Lens Debate...

Postby birddog114 on Thu Jul 21, 2005 2:52 pm

deapee wrote:Well, I'm ready to buy some high quality, medium telephoto zoom glass.

The options are as follows...please, I would like your input...

Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 HSM IF APO (New)

Nikon 80-200 f/2.8 I believe it's AF-S, IF and DX??? (Used)

They're going to be right around the same price -- between 500 and 700 -- the guy that is selling the 80-200 is not 100% sure he wants to sell it, and I'm not 100% sure I want to buy it -- is it a lot better than the newer Sigma?

Of course the Sigma would come with a warranty as well (could be worth the extra price you know?) -- the 80-200, I'm sure is working properly, he's a pretty good friend of mine and I trust him.

Thanks for the input.

Dave


The 80-200 has three versions:
ver. 1 Push & pull with AF without collar
ver.2 2 rings and AF-D with collar
ver.3 2 rings with collar and AF-S
No such of Nikkor 80-200 in DX format.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Glen on Thu Jul 21, 2005 2:54 pm

I would buy the Nikon if AFS, Sigma if not. Where are you situated, the US? $700Aus is very very cheap for the Sigma
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby deapee on Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:44 am

Yeah, I'm in the US. I believe he said AF-S -- I emailed him again, because I left my phone at work with his number in it. hrmm...well, still not sure what to do -- I know I wouldn't like messing with some push/pull lens, that seems odd...so if it's that, it's definately out.

Either way though, the AF-D and AF-S will communicate focal length with the camera, correct?
D70 | Nikkor 18-70 | Nikkor 80-200 f/2.8D ED | Nikkor 85 1.8D | Nikkor 50 1.8D | SB-600
User avatar
deapee
Newbie
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2005 9:17 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Postby birddog114 on Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:54 am

deapee wrote:Either way though, the AF-D and AF-S will communicate focal length with the camera, correct?


Yes, they're!
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Re: Lens Debate...

Postby redline on Fri Jul 22, 2005 3:02 pm

Birddog114 wrote:
deapee wrote:Well, I'm ready to buy some high quality, medium telephoto zoom glass.

The options are as follows...please, I would like your input...

Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 HSM IF APO (New)

Nikon 80-200 f/2.8 I believe it's AF-S, IF and DX??? (Used)

They're going to be right around the same price -- between 500 and 700 -- the guy that is selling the 80-200 is not 100% sure he wants to sell it, and I'm not 100% sure I want to buy it -- is it a lot better than the newer Sigma?

Of course the Sigma would come with a warranty as well (could be worth the extra price you know?) -- the 80-200, I'm sure is working properly, he's a pretty good friend of mine and I trust him.

Thanks for the input.

Dave


The 80-200 has three versions:
ver. 1 Push & pull with AF without collar
ver.2 2 rings and AF-D with collar
ver.3 2 rings with collar and AF-S
No such of Nikkor 80-200 in DX format.


i thought there were 2 versions of the Push & pull with AF without collar
one which takes lenses hood and ones which don't
Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
redline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1370
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:36 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby birddog114 on Fri Jul 22, 2005 3:47 pm

As far as I've seen and known they can both take lens hood but lens hood is an option, I've tried to put a lens hood of the 80-200 AF-D and it worked.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby redline on Fri Jul 22, 2005 3:55 pm

my push-pull can't take hoods but the other photog i meet at a shoot can.
i only paid 300$ for mine anywho.
Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
redline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1370
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:36 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby gstark on Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:09 pm

redline wrote:my push-pull can't take hoods but the other photog i meet at a shoot can.
i only paid 300$ for mine anywho.


Betcha it can.

Does it take filters?
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby redline on Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:24 pm

it use to until good'ol butter fingers dropped it.
but i was referring to the fact that some push-pull models could share the same lenses hood as the 2-ring versions.
Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
redline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1370
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:36 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby gstark on Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:30 pm

Ahhhhh .....

The old "bent filter ring" syndrome.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby deapee on Sat Jul 23, 2005 11:24 am

Nikon should make something between the 70-200 f/2.8 VR AFS and the 70-300 4-5.6 ... like an 80-200 f/4 AF-S for like $500
D70 | Nikkor 18-70 | Nikkor 80-200 f/2.8D ED | Nikkor 85 1.8D | Nikkor 50 1.8D | SB-600
User avatar
deapee
Newbie
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2005 9:17 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA


Return to General Discussion