no frills, no thrills tripod
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 8:26 pm
You know that thrill of taking a great photo. Well, tonight I didnt have it!
And as a result, I also understand why people are so fussy about tripods.
The scene...Perfect night from my balcony in Glebe of the Centrepoint tower half in, half out of clouds. Fading light...great! Get out my el-cheapo tripo... Now do you think that el-cheapo no-frills tripod (could have been purchased from Franklins) provides any stability whatsoever? Not a bit! Camera is visibly dancing around whilst the shutter is open! I didnt even bother trying to attach the 70-300 lens which is what I wanted to do - no point. So, you can imagine what the images are like!!
So, supposing you had a good tripod that actually did what a good tripod should do - a few questions:
1. What tripod would you have that was still able to be walked around with without a tribe of sherpas following (ie model)?
2. Would you use self-timer to set off the shutter, your finger or a remote (that I've seen referred to in other posts).
Thanks
Vic
And as a result, I also understand why people are so fussy about tripods.
The scene...Perfect night from my balcony in Glebe of the Centrepoint tower half in, half out of clouds. Fading light...great! Get out my el-cheapo tripo... Now do you think that el-cheapo no-frills tripod (could have been purchased from Franklins) provides any stability whatsoever? Not a bit! Camera is visibly dancing around whilst the shutter is open! I didnt even bother trying to attach the 70-300 lens which is what I wanted to do - no point. So, you can imagine what the images are like!!
So, supposing you had a good tripod that actually did what a good tripod should do - a few questions:
1. What tripod would you have that was still able to be walked around with without a tribe of sherpas following (ie model)?
2. Would you use self-timer to set off the shutter, your finger or a remote (that I've seen referred to in other posts).
Thanks
Vic