Sigma 50-500mm any comments?
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 5:48 pm
As part of my continuing Lens Lust (love that expression). I've been looking at the specs of the Sigma 50-500mm APO Blah Blah Blah lens.
With the shortage of Nikon lenses at realistic prices would the 50-500 be a useful lens for say sporting / nature shots? I do realise there is no image stabilisation, but the best stabiliser in the world has to be a tripod followed by a monopod surely? It is a daylight sort of lens I realise also.
I'd be interested in hearing from anyone who owns one and their comments and experiences good or bad and in particular if anyone has one that they are considering selling.
My big problem is that even with my low level 300mm lens I still find myself wanting more reach, and even with the sharpness of the XX-200VR lens I'm not convinced it would suit me for what I shoot (looking back over exif data).
A 50-500 range is obviously a big ask, but surely they wouldn't sell them into the marketplace if they were complete rubbish......?
Regards
Tony
With the shortage of Nikon lenses at realistic prices would the 50-500 be a useful lens for say sporting / nature shots? I do realise there is no image stabilisation, but the best stabiliser in the world has to be a tripod followed by a monopod surely? It is a daylight sort of lens I realise also.
I'd be interested in hearing from anyone who owns one and their comments and experiences good or bad and in particular if anyone has one that they are considering selling.
My big problem is that even with my low level 300mm lens I still find myself wanting more reach, and even with the sharpness of the XX-200VR lens I'm not convinced it would suit me for what I shoot (looking back over exif data).
A 50-500 range is obviously a big ask, but surely they wouldn't sell them into the marketplace if they were complete rubbish......?
Regards
Tony