With everyone getting new bodies, I think that separate section for you to proudly display your first image from your new acquisition is in order.
This applies to brand new bodies, as well as bodies that are simply newly acquired by you.
Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 800 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and no more than four images per post.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by biggerry on Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:38 pm
All I need now is for someone to sell me a 1.4 TC and I will be sorted... for a awhile anyway...Nikkor 300mm f4 AFS, this is one sharp lens, its makes my 100-300mm f5.6 look like a coke bottle...which i must say I thought was pretty sharp given its age etc... a few of the first images from this lens, its amazing how few shots I take now that i dont need to manually focus...    
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by surenj on Thu Apr 15, 2010 11:58 pm
Congrats on your new acquisition and I can see it's in good hands. I will wait for the birds with great bokeh.. biggerry wrote:sell me a 1.4 TC and I will be sorted
Doubt it... There is always the 300 2.8, then 400 2.8, then 200-400 4, then 600....then switch to Canon for the 1200. 
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by terminator on Fri Apr 16, 2010 9:58 am
yep it is a great lens. Nice to see it`s getting some good use!
Termy,
http://www.glennlegge.com
"There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs."
Ansel Adams (1902 - 1984)
-

terminator
- Member
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:23 pm
- Location: Woody Point QLD
-
by MATT on Fri Apr 16, 2010 10:01 am
Nice images and the AF-s sound sweet.
I wounder how a 70-200 VR with a 1.7 TC would compare to this lens in terms of focus speed and sharpness?
Regards
MATT
-

MATT
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1748
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:24 pm
- Location: Biloela, QLD-----nikon--D700-----
by chrisk on Fri Apr 16, 2010 10:17 am
always had a soft spot for the 300/4 afs...it was my first love. lol sharp as a tack. i also ran it alot with the 1.7TC and in good light it was still very impressive for anything but the most demanding of scenarios.
MATT: i had both the 300/4 and the 70-200+1.7TC and the 300 from my experience was sharper and faster. i didn't have the 1.4TC at the time i had my 70-200 so cant comment on that setup.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-

chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
by biggerry on Fri Apr 16, 2010 10:18 pm
I will wait for the birds with great bokeh..
lol, yeah, but only the real birds..the ones with two or more engines Nice to see it`s getting some good use!
its gonna cop a flogging when i had out to Temora again soon! Thanks again. i also ran it alot with the 1.7TC and in good light it was still very impressive for anything but the most demanding of scenarios.
yeah I am tossing up between the 1.4 and the 1.7, luckily I have plenty of time to think about that choice.. 
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by chrisk on Fri Apr 16, 2010 10:45 pm
biggerry wrote:yeah I am tossing up between the 1.4 and the 1.7, luckily I have plenty of time to think about that choice.. 
let me know if you need to borrow them. i have both so you can use them on your lens for a weekend to see which one you prefer.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-

chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
by biggerry on Fri Apr 16, 2010 11:18 pm
let me know if you need to borrow them. i have both so you can use them on your lens for a weekend to see which one you prefer.
thanks for the offer Chris! I may well take you up on that one, either that or will have to organise a DSLRusers plane shoot.. maybe a weekend day out at Temora http://www.aviationmuseum.com.au/news/FlyingDates.cfm
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by chrisk on Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:17 am
no worries mate. i know how hard it is to try and pick a bit of kit blind. always helps if you can have a run of it before you fork out any cash just to be sure.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-

chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
by Murray Foote on Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:57 am
Hi Gerry
I've got one too and have got some really good images with it. I picked up a 1.4TC from Adorama at a good price at as-new and when I ordered it they responded and said they'd just noticed some cosmetic damage on it and did I still want it and would it be OK if they Took $50 off the price.
So B&H and Adorama are worth considering including second hand because I suspect there's not much to go wrong with a second-hand TC. Most don't get used much and i know I haven 't used mine much (though it does work fine).
-

Murray Foote
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1291
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:31 pm
- Location: Ainslie, Canberra
by aim54x on Sat Apr 17, 2010 10:25 am
Congrats Gerry, glad to see that you picked up that lens.
Cant wait till you start pounding us with warbird photos.
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by Jenno on Sat Apr 17, 2010 1:08 pm
I will wait for the birds with great bokeh..
Gerry might have to purchase another copy...seems this one is programmed to shot planes only 
-

Jenno
- Member
-
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 4:15 pm
- Location: The Hills District Sydney
by biggerry on Sat Apr 17, 2010 7:07 pm
Murray Foote wrote:So B&H and Adorama are worth considering including second hand because I suspect there's not much to go wrong with a second-hand TC. Most don't get used much and i know I haven 't used mine much (though it does work fine).
good idea, I have looked there, I actually looked for a 300mm f/4 but they had nothing at the time (excluding the older model) - I will keep my peepers on there more often.. aim54x wrote:Cant wait till you start pounding us with warbird photos.
can't wait either  Jenno wrote:Gerry might have to purchase another copy...seems this one is programmed to shot planes only
doh! I did take some shots of pigeons this morning...but the planes were more interesting...  plus those pigeons shat on my car this morning..so they dont deserve to be photographed..punks.
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by biggerry on Sat Apr 17, 2010 7:15 pm
just for kicks and giggles...i compared some A380 shots from last year with my 100-300mm to some I took this morning, the conditions were definitely similiar, clear sky, no cloud and after some rain the nigth before. below are the processed shots - the 100-300mm version has sharpening applied. However it gets more interesting looking at the cropped versions - these are unmodifed, cropped to 200% and resized to 800px. 100-300mm f/5.6 (probably taken at f8)  300mm f4  100-300mm f/5.6 (probably taken at f8)  300mm f4 
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by heartyfisher on Sun Apr 18, 2010 2:15 am
Hi Gerry,
You are getting a nice collection of lenses there.. That 300 F4 is one of the lesser known gems! Congratulations!
-
heartyfisher
- Newbie
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 5:05 pm
- Location: chatswood sydney
-
by aim54x on Mon Apr 19, 2010 12:29 am
This new lens looks heaps better than that 100-300!!! I am sure you are very glad to have it.
Can you reprogramme the lens for planes with 1 engine as well as more than one engine pls???
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by biggerry on Mon Apr 19, 2010 8:31 pm
That 300 F4 is one of the lesser known gems!
i amm sooo in love... Can you reprogramme the lens for planes with 1 engine as well as more than one engine pls???
lol standby.
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by biggerry on Mon Apr 19, 2010 11:18 pm
The new TC20EIII may be an option too (though no doubt expensive)
apparently on anything less than a f2.8 its not worthwhile? - rockwell also states it won't autofocus on a 300mm f4. At this point I am finding the 1.5 crop factor gives me all the reach I need with 300mm, but undoubtly a 1.4x will be welcome in time.. 
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by Murray Foote on Mon Apr 19, 2010 11:36 pm
It will work on at least some F4 lenses, though not as well as f2.8, but you're right, probably not the 300 f4.
I was forgetting you are on DX; it gives me pretty much all I need n FX.
-

Murray Foote
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1291
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:31 pm
- Location: Ainslie, Canberra
Return to First Image
|