Tamron 17-50mm f2.8

With everyone getting new bodies, I think that separate section for you to proudly display your first image from your new acquisition is in order.

This applies to brand new bodies, as well as bodies that are simply newly acquired by you.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 800 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and no more than four images per post.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Tamron 17-50mm f2.8

Postby Ant on Fri May 14, 2010 10:12 pm

Well, after taking the advice on my previous thread I went with the Tamron 17-50, the internal focus motor, non VC version.

These are the first and third shots I took with it:
Image

And this one
Image

Both of these were shot wide open with available light. I have a lot to learn, but already am liking this lens. Both of these were adjusted for vingette.
D90 | D50 | Tamron 17-50 2.8| AF-S 18-55 DX (and VR) | Sigma 70 - 300 APO DG | 50mm 1.8 | SB-600
User avatar
Ant
Member
 
Posts: 304
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 7:29 pm
Location: Lyndhurst, Melbourne

Re: Tamron 17-50mm f2.8

Postby photomarcs on Fri May 14, 2010 11:46 pm

Glad you made the right decision :D

( was kinda hard to when tossing up between two lenses that would perform wonderfully anyways, but glad you got the Tamron.. welcome to Maxwell Australia).

Tack sharp isn't it? :cheers:
Canon | Sony | Panasonic | Tamron | Sigma
My photography is still developing.
Don't be so negative!
http://www.photomarcs.com
User avatar
photomarcs
Member
 
Posts: 417
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:47 pm
Location: Liverpool, Sydney Australia

Re: Tamron 17-50mm f2.8

Postby Ant on Sat May 15, 2010 12:18 am

photomarcs wrote:Tack sharp isn't it? :cheers:


Sure is, especially compared to the two kit 18-55's I have. I can't imagine them ever going back on either body unless I have a huge need for the VR! Problem is, now I am going to want to upgrade my 70-300... The D90 is definitely showing the weaknesses in glass more than my D50 did.
D90 | D50 | Tamron 17-50 2.8| AF-S 18-55 DX (and VR) | Sigma 70 - 300 APO DG | 50mm 1.8 | SB-600
User avatar
Ant
Member
 
Posts: 304
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 7:29 pm
Location: Lyndhurst, Melbourne

Re: Tamron 17-50mm f2.8

Postby aim54x on Sat May 15, 2010 1:24 am

Congrats on the purchase.....you will enjoy this lens greatly!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: Tamron 17-50mm f2.8

Postby photomarcs on Sat May 15, 2010 10:03 am

Ant wrote: now I am going to want to upgrade my 70-300...



*COUGH COUGH* TAMRON 70-200 f2.8 * COUGH COUGH*

sorry.. i've got a bug in my throat :P
Canon | Sony | Panasonic | Tamron | Sigma
My photography is still developing.
Don't be so negative!
http://www.photomarcs.com
User avatar
photomarcs
Member
 
Posts: 417
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:47 pm
Location: Liverpool, Sydney Australia

Re: Tamron 17-50mm f2.8

Postby Ant on Sat May 15, 2010 1:30 pm

photomarcs wrote:
Ant wrote: now I am going to want to upgrade my 70-300...



*COUGH COUGH* TAMRON 70-200 f2.8 * COUGH COUGH*

sorry.. i've got a bug in my throat :P


Don't encourage me... It will be a little while before I do this, probably a christmas pressie to myself
D90 | D50 | Tamron 17-50 2.8| AF-S 18-55 DX (and VR) | Sigma 70 - 300 APO DG | 50mm 1.8 | SB-600
User avatar
Ant
Member
 
Posts: 304
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 7:29 pm
Location: Lyndhurst, Melbourne


Return to First Image