A lazy man's guide to stitching images

Forum rules and nettiquette, along with other items of general interest.

Important information about this forum is contained here, and members MUST familiarise themselves with the posts here, as well as what is contained within the FAQ.

Please do not complain if you ask a question regarding a topic covered here or in the FAQ and in response you get a rather brusque, obtuse or sarcastic response. We get sick and tired of answering the same questions, day in, day out, when the answers are clearly published, in plain view, and all that is required is for you to open your eyes and read them!

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

A lazy man's guide to stitching images

Postby mudder on Sun Mar 19, 2006 12:40 pm

G'day all,

Dunno if this is going to be helpful to anyone or not but it seems to help me, so what the heck...

I've been playing with stitching some images and I've had some problems when I've used the 12-24 due to what I assume to be distortion in the image (pin-cushion?), particularly at the wide end...

So, rather than use Photoshop automate (or other stitching apps) is:
1) Create a new image with a big enough canvass to hold both images
2) Paste both images into that new blank canvass
3) Lower the opacity of each layer so I can see when they lined up while I drag one over the other
4) Reset the opacity
5) create a mask for each layer
6) Use a soft feathered eraser on each of the joins in the masks, erase the very edge of each layer where they overlap.

This way I could determine where the join/stitch is, how it's feathered, I can go around rocks and things, having only one image totally showing a foreground subject, with the blending edge not going through anything of interest the viewer might look at. You can make the "blending edge" where-ever you want and follow what ever you want.

Seems a really easy way to stitch and even using the 12-24 @12mm, stitching's really easy and seemless... I might go back to some old pano's and re-do them this way instead of using the automate function.

For those that like stitching, try it, see what you think...

Examples, these I posted in another thread:

2 images using x12_24@12mm in landscape(!) orientation. The two images couldn't blend using automate as the differences between them on their edges was too great, they were very different and I had no hope trying to match them up...:
Image


5(!) images using the 12-24@24mm in portrait orientation:
Image
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby ajax on Sun Mar 19, 2006 1:53 pm

Andrew,

great technic.
Hope is immortal...
User avatar
ajax
Member
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 8:13 am
Location: Glen Waverley, VIC

Postby ABG on Sun Mar 19, 2006 2:03 pm

Thanks for sharing Andrew. I've never had a crack at a pano and now you've really left me with no excuses (no pano head perhaps :P ).

It's guys like you who help make the learning curve in digital photography less daunting for newbies like me. :D
Andrew
User avatar
ABG
Senior Member
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Oatley, Sydney

Postby mudder on Sun Mar 19, 2006 2:21 pm

ABG wrote:Thanks for sharing Andrew. I've never had a crack at a pano and now you've really left me with no excuses (no pano head perhaps :P ).

It's guys like you who help make the learning curve in digital photography less daunting for newbies like me. :D


G'day,

I've bought a King-pano head and haven't used it yet :lol: Should be good though when I do some non-sunset/sunrise landscape stuff with it when there's a detailed foreground subject to grab the viewers eye, within a really deep DOF with mountains or something in the distance. I believe the pano heads are good for minimising parallax error due to pivoting the camera on the nodal point of the lens (rather than he screw attachment on the base of the body), so the stitching's easier and more accurate. At least I hope to confirm when I get off my arse and actually use the pano head :lol:

Oh, and I've learnt so much from knowledgeable, friendly, and sharing guys and gals on this forum, I still consider myself a bit of a newbie when it comes to composition or any creative aspect but if I can return anything to this forum then it's worth doing :)

Cheers.
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East


Return to Information