ARTICLES: ISO and Images Quality Comparison

Those nice to know things about your DSLR will be found here. How to do this, and why you probably should not do that.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

ARTICLES: ISO and Images Quality Comparison

Postby DragonStar on Wed Aug 18, 2004 10:57 pm

http://articles.lewisvincent.com/iso

This is an article that I am starting to write, it contains a comparison of ISO quality and image quality in the Nikon D70. Once again, feel free to read, comment and let me know generally what it's like!! :P

Thanks!
DragonStar
DragonStar
Newbie
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 10:18 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Postby beetleboy on Sat Sep 18, 2004 10:43 pm

This comparison would probably work better if you used jpg compression rather than gif as your images are suffering from a bit of dithering caused by the reduced colour range that gif is capable of (256).

Also, I think you'll find jpg is the most commonly used compression on the net..gif is reserved more for animations and graphics that don't require too many colours.
User avatar
beetleboy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 821
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 4:57 am
Location: Highbury, Adelaide

Postby hillsrain on Sat Sep 18, 2004 11:10 pm

Hey there Dragon Star,
Its an interesting comparo, good to see it all on one page.
BB is right about using JPEG's though. You will much better display your images in this format.
Keep working on this page though and let us know how you go. A good reference for new D70 users and others alike.
Cheers,
Tim :D
User avatar
hillsrain
Newbie
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 10:08 pm
Location: Meadows SA

Re: ARTICLES: ISO and Images Quality Comparison

Postby Matt. K on Sun Sep 19, 2004 2:55 pm

The reason the RAW files sem to be a bit noisier is because the camera has not carried out any processing to remove it. The JPG files are processed by the camera. I think you''ll find that removing the noise from a RAW file will result in a cleaner image then a comparable JPG cleaned by the camera. This presupposes that care is taken with the process.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra


Return to Tips and tricks