DSLRUsers.com

A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.

Skip to content

Nikkor 35-70mm f/2.8D AF ( 2 pics )

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Write comments

Nikkor 35-70mm f/2.8D AF ( 2 pics )

Postby KerryPierce on Wed Aug 17, 2005 10:20 am

Nikon D70s ,Nikkor 35-70mm f/2.8D AF
1/500s f/5.0 at 70.0mm with Flash hand held

Image
Nikon D70s ,Nikkor 35-70mm f/2.8D AF
1/500s f/6.3 at 35.0mm hand held

Image
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI
Top

Postby MHD on Wed Aug 17, 2005 10:37 am

Hmm...35-70/2.8... never seen that one??
Is it similar to the 28-70?

Nice colour on the couple!
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs
Top

Postby birddog114 on Wed Aug 17, 2005 10:40 am

MHD wrote:Hmm...35-70/2.8... never seen that one??
Is it similar to the 28-70?

Nice colour on the couple!


No, it's smaller than 28-70 and less popular with DSLR due to its focal lenght on 1.5x crop factor.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney
Top

Postby sirhc55 on Wed Aug 17, 2005 10:42 am

Scott - it’s in the Nikon lens lineup :D

Kerry - this is a major divergence for you, from the zoo to humans :lol:

In the second shot - there are two things I noticed that I like - one foot of the foreground lady and the man are just off the ground (a decisive moment) and the look on the other ladies face - envy :?:

Very nice shots
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
Top

Postby KerryPierce on Wed Aug 17, 2005 11:06 am

MHD wrote:Hmm...35-70/2.8... never seen that one??
Is it similar to the 28-70?
 AFAIK, it's the optical equivalent of the more expensive lens, but without AF-S and is a push-pull zoom. It's an excellent lens and a good value, IMO.

Nice colour on the couple!

heh, thanks. :) The wedding shots were under terrible conditions. Beastly hot, bright, harsh sunlight, and deep shadows with backlighting. :roll:
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI
Top

Postby KerryPierce on Wed Aug 17, 2005 11:13 am

sirhc55 wrote:Kerry - this is a major divergence for you, from the zoo to humans :lol:

I got lots of human shots. :D Prolly more than zoo shots. :shock:
In the second shot - there are two things I noticed that I like - one foot of the foreground lady and the man are just off the ground (a decisive moment) and the look on the other ladies face - envy :?:

Very nice shots

The feet off the ground was just luck. :P The lady in the background was a very fair skinned redhead. I don't think I got one shot of her that didn't blow out on her skin. She was always in the sun, while the others were in the shade or had a darker complexion. In this shot, it looks like she was looking at me, so it's no wonder she had that look of amusement or chagrin on her face. :lol:
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI
Top
Write comments

Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Copyright © 2005 - 2022 Gary Stark


Portal XL 5.0 ~ Plain 0.2