Focus technique question

Newer members often state that they think their question is too basic, or stupid, or whatever, to be posted. Nothing could be further further from the truth in any section at DSLRUsers.com, but especially here. Don't feel intimidated. The only stupid question is the one that remains unasked. We were all beginners at one stage, and even the most experienced amongst us will admit to learning new stuff on a daily basis. Ask away! Please also refer to the forum rules and the portal page

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

Focus technique question

Postby OzzieGirl on Wed Aug 17, 2005 1:12 pm

I shot some pics of my friends dog the other day and noticed that in one of the images, the only part of the photo that was in focus is the face of the dog.
Here is the pic-
Image

Do you think this kind of focus technique is ok, to draw attention to the detail of the dogs face or does it detract from the photo?
User avatar
OzzieGirl
Newbie
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 6:41 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby Marvin on Wed Aug 17, 2005 1:15 pm

I don't think it detracts from the photo at all. You want the attention to be on the face so it is good use of depth of field IMHO.
User avatar
Marvin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1486
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Back in the hot Riverland, SA.

Postby gstark on Wed Aug 17, 2005 1:24 pm

I fully agree with marvin's comment on this.

And furthermore, fetch!
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby MHD on Wed Aug 17, 2005 1:32 pm

Great photo... yes, this is classic portrature... you have the subject in focus and a nice soft out of focus background... it highlights the subject and does not detract from the subject...

Great expression on the dog!

*Woof*
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby Glen on Wed Aug 17, 2005 1:35 pm

I agree, looks very good. :D

The other point is that was shot at f4.5 for 1/80sec, at a higher f number to give more depth of field may have been too slow a shutter speed for a moving dog. Eg f22 would approximately require 1/2.5 sec.
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby OzzieGirl on Wed Aug 17, 2005 1:46 pm

Thanks for the feedback everyone. I'm having great fun learning all about photography with my new D50.
Look forward to contributing some pics to the forum soon. :)
User avatar
OzzieGirl
Newbie
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 6:41 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby sirhc55 on Wed Aug 17, 2005 1:47 pm

The face is the main subject, not his/her tail - ipso facto very nice pic :D
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby johnd on Wed Aug 17, 2005 1:55 pm

Not only do I think this technique is OK. I think it's THE way to bring attention to the main feature of the photo, the dogs face.
Often the background stuff is a distraction, so it's a great idea to blur it out.
I really like this shot. It says "I'm having fun, come and play".
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby PiroStitch on Wed Aug 17, 2005 2:10 pm

The depth of field in the photo is fine...in fact it's pretty much spot on :)

Also Ozziegirl, there's a Melbourne night meet next Friday night. For more details have a look at this topic:

http://www.d70users.com/viewtopic.php?t=8172

If you're free come and meet the other Melbourne members :)
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby genji on Wed Aug 17, 2005 2:15 pm

fantastic portrait of your friends dog! Which lens did you use?, because the colour saturation and sharpnest is amazing esp at f4.
[every man's work is always a portrait of himself.
Ansel Adams, Carmel, California, 1979]
User avatar
genji
Senior Member
 
Posts: 570
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:08 pm
Location: Carlton ------->D[enter number here]<-------

Postby OzzieGirl on Wed Aug 17, 2005 3:10 pm

PiroStitch- I'd definitely like to come along to one of the Melbourne meets. :)
It would be great to catch up with everyone, but i'm not sure if I can make it to this one.

genji- I used the 18-70mm D70s lens. I was pleasantly surprised with the sharpness & colour of these dog pics.
User avatar
OzzieGirl
Newbie
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 6:41 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby genji on Wed Aug 17, 2005 3:15 pm

OzzieGirl wrote:PiroStitch- I'd definitely like to come along to one of the Melbourne meets. :)
It would be great to catch up with everyone, but i'm not sure if I can make it to this one.

next time then...

OzzieGirl wrote:genji- I used the 18-70mm D70s lens. I was pleasantly surprised with the sharpness & colour of these dog pics.


I dont have this lens, so I am constantly surprised at the results, esp wide open!!
[every man's work is always a portrait of himself.
Ansel Adams, Carmel, California, 1979]
User avatar
genji
Senior Member
 
Posts: 570
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:08 pm
Location: Carlton ------->D[enter number here]<-------


Return to Absolute Beginners Questions