Focus technique questionModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Focus technique questionI shot some pics of my friends dog the other day and noticed that in one of the images, the only part of the photo that was in focus is the face of the dog.
Here is the pic- Do you think this kind of focus technique is ok, to draw attention to the detail of the dogs face or does it detract from the photo?
I fully agree with marvin's comment on this.
And furthermore, fetch! g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Great photo... yes, this is classic portrature... you have the subject in focus and a nice soft out of focus background... it highlights the subject and does not detract from the subject...
Great expression on the dog! *Woof* New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
I agree, looks very good.
The other point is that was shot at f4.5 for 1/80sec, at a higher f number to give more depth of field may have been too slow a shutter speed for a moving dog. Eg f22 would approximately require 1/2.5 sec. http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
Not only do I think this technique is OK. I think it's THE way to bring attention to the main feature of the photo, the dogs face.
Often the background stuff is a distraction, so it's a great idea to blur it out. I really like this shot. It says "I'm having fun, come and play". D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
The depth of field in the photo is fine...in fact it's pretty much spot on
Also Ozziegirl, there's a Melbourne night meet next Friday night. For more details have a look at this topic: http://www.d70users.com/viewtopic.php?t=8172 If you're free come and meet the other Melbourne members Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
fantastic portrait of your friends dog! Which lens did you use?, because the colour saturation and sharpnest is amazing esp at f4.
[every man's work is always a portrait of himself.
Ansel Adams, Carmel, California, 1979]
PiroStitch- I'd definitely like to come along to one of the Melbourne meets.
It would be great to catch up with everyone, but i'm not sure if I can make it to this one. genji- I used the 18-70mm D70s lens. I was pleasantly surprised with the sharpness & colour of these dog pics.
next time then...
I dont have this lens, so I am constantly surprised at the results, esp wide open!! [every man's work is always a portrait of himself.
Ansel Adams, Carmel, California, 1979]
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|