Played with my new Nikon 50mm 1.8 D lens today.

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Played with my new Nikon 50mm 1.8 D lens today.

Postby John H. on Fri Jul 22, 2005 10:45 pm

I took my new lens out for a spin today, and although Newcastle was blanketed in a thick fog for most of the morning I did have some fun.

This is a shot of a steel lifting ring in a concrete block on Nobbys point.

Image
Cheers
John H.
User avatar
John H.
Newbie
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:52 pm
Location: Newcastle

Postby thaddeus on Fri Jul 22, 2005 10:52 pm

interesting
was it possible to frame the arch over the lighthouse?
User avatar
thaddeus
Member
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 10:04 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby Nnnnsic on Fri Jul 22, 2005 11:03 pm

Hmm.. I like it.

I think it would be even better if the saturation would be pushed a little bit more.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby John H. on Fri Jul 22, 2005 11:09 pm

thaddeus wrote:interesting
was it possible to frame the arch over the lighthouse?


I did get one like that but I don't care for it much.

Image
Cheers
John H.
User avatar
John H.
Newbie
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:52 pm
Location: Newcastle

Postby sirhc55 on Fri Jul 22, 2005 11:35 pm

Both shots have merit - but what camera and lens were you using :?:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Nnnnsic on Fri Jul 22, 2005 11:52 pm

He was using his new 50mm 1.8... :)

(See the title and the first post)
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby Alex on Fri Jul 22, 2005 11:57 pm

John H. wrote:
thaddeus wrote:interesting
was it possible to frame the arch over the lighthouse?


I did get one like that but I don't care for it much.

Image


I like this one, John. What aperture was this shot at? Perhaps a greater DOF would be benefitial.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby leek on Sat Jul 23, 2005 12:06 am

I like both... but probably prefer the first...

What was the rusty hoop in the ground???
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby PiroStitch on Sat Jul 23, 2005 12:19 am

Great bang for your buck lens ain't it :D
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby John H. on Sat Jul 23, 2005 12:47 am

sirhc55 wrote:Both shots have merit - but what camera and lens were you using :?:


Nikon D70s with Nikon 50mm 1.8 D
Cheers
John H.
User avatar
John H.
Newbie
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:52 pm
Location: Newcastle

Postby John H. on Sat Jul 23, 2005 1:07 am

Thanks to all for the comments.

Alex, It was shot at f8, and the shallow DOF was intentional as I wanted to draw attention to the ring. Had the ring been larger, such that the lighthouse was completely visible, then it might have been a good shot.

leek, there are a series of large concrete blocks in place to stop erosion. The rings in the blocks allowed for the blocks placement by crane.

PiroStitch, at the price I don't see how anyone can afford not to have one.
Cheers
John H.
User avatar
John H.
Newbie
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:52 pm
Location: Newcastle

Postby Jeff on Sat Jul 23, 2005 7:26 am

Hi John H ,nice shot and I agree at the price of the 50mm 1.8 how could you not have one.
Jeff
User avatar
Jeff
Senior Member
 
Posts: 726
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Terrey Hills

Postby kipper on Sat Jul 23, 2005 7:36 am

I went nuts one day and bought the 50MM 1.4 from Vanbar, I had it in my hands at the shop, next minute I know I have it in my bag.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby gstark on Sat Jul 23, 2005 9:01 am

John H. wrote:Thanks to all for the comments.

Alex, It was shot at f8, and the shallow DOF was intentional as I wanted to draw attention to the ring. Had the ring been larger, such that the lighthouse was completely visible, then it might have been a good shot.


That's where you could have probably taken advantage of SneakerZoom (TM, Pat. Pending) to deal with the issue.

It's purely an attribute of the relative perspective of the two elements in the image, and by moving maybe an inch or three closer to the ring, I suspect that you could have achieved exactly that effect.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Poon on Thu Aug 18, 2005 7:16 pm

John,
Last week I was in New Castle beach but missed it.
Your picture is beautiful and special and it reminds me of some pictures I took over there.
<img src=http://imagehost.vendio.com/preview/hk/hksupplies/aw11.jpg>
<img src=http://imagehost.vendio.com/preview/hk/hksupplies/aw10.jpg>
Jean in New Castle Aug 9, 2005
----------
Regards
Poon
User avatar
Poon
The HK Connection
 
Posts: 323
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 9:32 pm
Location: Hong Kong

Postby christiand on Thu Aug 18, 2005 7:24 pm

Hi John,

here is an idea:

take two photos.
One with arch and lighthouse shap.
The other with arch sharp and lighthouse and back ground blurred.
Combine the two photos so that you have arch and lighthouse sharp,
left and right back ground of the arch blurred.

Cheers,
CD
User avatar
christiand
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques