Some birds from Belmont Wetlands - ID of bird also requiredModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Some birds from Belmont Wetlands - ID of bird also requiredHi,
as some of you may have read some other recent posts of mine, I was at the recently announced Belmont Wetlands State Park, for a lack of a better name, on Sunday. I managed to take a few bird shots, first ones really, so hints, comments, and also ID of the birds in question, much appreciated. All shots were done with D70s, 70-300mm ED, ISO 400, handheld late afternoon. Conditions were windy, one of the reason that I bumped up the ISO a bit. Other then cropping and sharpenning after the crop, not much else PP done. Heron, Shutter: 1/500 Aperture: 7.1 focal length: 190mm Type of hawk - falcon??? Shutter: 1/1000 Aperture: 6.3 focal length: 200mm Managed to get closer Shutter: 1/500 Aperture: 10.0 focal length: 300mm Also got a few pictures of finches and or wrens, but didn't quite come out, they are hard to photograph. As I think kipper said, I'll have to be very patient for those and learn their habits. Also were some black cockatoos in the distance, but couldn't get close enough, not to mention ducks, so plenty for next time Comments appreciated, Thanks, Radar aka André Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
that was quick , thanks kipper.
Cheers, radar Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
Hi Radar,
I like the third one. You have caught the colourings of the bird quite nicely, and from a good angle/perspective. Just curious to know if you tried to crop it to make it more of a portrait rather than landscape layout? I think it could work quite well with some of the excess sky and vegetation cropped out so that it doesn't distract your eye from the bird. Cheers. Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
The last Kestrel pic is quite nice.
There is a small dust bunny next to his beak. I think your CCD might need cleaning, unless the kestrel caught it first. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
As suggested, here is a picture that is more cropped. Has the side benefit of getting rid of that dust bunny and now that I know its name...
(Click on image for full size image) I'll get to use that air rocket now thanks, Radar Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
Hi Radar,
It is beautiful. Looks like an old painting. I like also Lake Macquarie. Visited there few times. Lucky you live there. Here are two pictures from Lake Macquarie in this month. <img src=http://imagehost.vendio.com/preview/hk/hksupplies/aw14.jpg> <img src=http://imagehost.vendio.com/preview/hk/hksupplies/aw13.jpg> --------------- Regards Poon
André
I really like the first one and especially like the pano style crop you've used. I think this really brings out this image. I do however think all of these shots could be a bit brighter from a tiny amount of contrast or curve adjustment. Thanks for showing this spot to us. I look forward to visiting it soon. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Hi Poon,
Lake Macquarie is a great spot, know exactly where you took your pictures. That blue house if very "distinctive". Thanks for the comments Stubbsy. I have done a bit of playing with curves/contrast/brightness and it does improve. I just have to get in the habit of using the tools at my disposition in PP Cheers, Radar Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|