Two beach perspectives

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Two beach perspectives

Postby Willy wombat on Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:54 pm

They are quite different, but only shot about ten minutes and 100 meters apart.

[img]http://www.fototime.com/{9F370A20-F9B4-4B9F-8F5A-5AAB742F28D2}/picture.JPG[/img]
Blue tranquility



[img]http://www.fototime.com/{3EB090DD-E01E-487C-882B-0ED41C247212}/picture.JPG[/img]
Friendly yellow haze
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby owen on Tue Aug 30, 2005 12:27 am

Hi Willy.

Honestly the first one doesn't do anything for me. It's dull and dark and there's not much of a subject.

However the second one has promise. The bits that draw my attention are the people and the larger wave in the background, but something seems to be missing in between. Perhaps a lower perspective, perhaps a more compressed view from a longer zoom I'm not sure, but go back and have another go and see what you can do :)

Perhaps if the beach curled around on the RHS of the frame then it would add something?

Cheers,
Owen.
http://www.ausphotos.com - My Gallery

http://www.doesgodexist.com - a very interesting site.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby dooda on Tue Aug 30, 2005 3:57 am

Both are nice pics. I agree about the flatness of the second one though, there seems to be some sort of perspective problem or something. The first is a tad underexposed, but it is nice, shoot this in raw and you should be able to bring it up a little bit.

I find your frames incredibly distracting and hurtful to the effect of the photo. I dislike the use of most frames, but the white ring is a terrible addition as well. Sorry, but if anything I'd stick with a simply thin black frame. Just my opinion of course.
love's first sighs are wisdom's last

Dave
http://www.flickr.com/photos/elton/
User avatar
dooda
Party Animal
 
Posts: 1591
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada

Postby Willy wombat on Tue Aug 30, 2005 8:02 pm

Owen and Dooda - thanks for the honest feedback. I appreciate it. Dooda im still working on my frames. I need to apply more of the KISS ideas to my framing.

I played with another image to try and avoid the darkness, although I would like to know all your thoughts on how I should treat this image to remove the "blueness" from the rock in the foreground.

[img]http://www.fototime.com/{C34826F3-47F8-47EE-BECD-93D5A558AE94}/picture.JPG[/img]

Cheers
WW
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby Willy wombat on Tue Aug 30, 2005 8:03 pm

Here is another one of the tessellated region.

[img]http://www.fototime.com/{DBC94C24-47C1-4B3F-8CE5-7599604F98D5}/picture.JPG[/img]
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby owen on Tue Aug 30, 2005 11:44 pm

Hi Willy.

If you've got the RAW file, perhaps you can try changing the colour temperature to counter the 'blueness'. Otherwise in photoshop if you've got that, use the channel mixer and choose the blue channel, have a fiddle with the colours in there.

Cheers,
Owen.
http://www.ausphotos.com - My Gallery

http://www.doesgodexist.com - a very interesting site.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques