Australian wild flowersModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Australian wild flowersJust processed a few from the weekend.
Used circ pol filter + kit lense Enjoy [img]http://www.fototime.com/{9B890BAF-2C27-446F-89F4-E8C332267C32}/picture.JPG[/img] Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
107 views and no comments...
Is it run-of-the-mill? If this shot is no good can someone please point out why? Cheers WW Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
I like it Willy. Sort of creeps up on you after you look at it a couple of times. I guess if I had to add something constructive it would be that the subject is a little busy - lots of different varieties that almost compete with each other for the viewer's attention. It's hard to know what to focus on.
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
I seem to get caught in the trap of using too little DOF as I am seriously in love with the effect. I think that this shot is probably suffering from the same problem.
Maybe hold back on the polarisation also, its a wonderous filter but overcooking it can take some of the impact away. Just my 2c worth. Ed. Ed.
Proudly using cardboard camera, lens lust is cheap... buy more bog rolls!!!
I think that Simon has hit the nail on the head. It is a nice enough image, but struggles to stand on it's own without a focal point.
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"
D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
No focal point. Too busy. I can see your point.
Thanks for the feedback. Will work on it. Cheers guys! Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
WW
I agree on the lack of a focal point....my eye seems to wander around the image, not sure on what to stop at. However the colour in the sky is beautiful. Such a nice blue. Keep on, keeping on..... Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|