Some photos from our trip to SydneyModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
20 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Some photos from our trip to SydneyI'll add more as I get through them.
This was my first hand held attempt with a subject and water. Was taken at the top waterfall in the Chinese Gardens, Darling Harbour, the willing subject is my wife Shutter priority, 1/2 second F/22. 28-80G. I do notice the overexposed area and it bugs me... Cheers Brett
great shot... especially with the slow shutter speed... your wife must have been perfectly still ...
the over exposure can't really be helped with the direct sun... but i've given it a go for you... sorry... that's about the best i can do.... http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
It's a really good attempt to get the effect you were after.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Meerkats... Quite appropriate as we went to the Lion King the next day. Both shot with the 70-300G, not at full focal length though
Brett
brett ... those meerkats are wonderful... well done.
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
Good photo
I've tried to crop the photo and see how that looks. Hope you don't mind. Rule of thirds can't be used here when this is done unfortunately Was the overblown right hand side obvious in the preview screen? Cheers Graham
Those Meerkats are absolutely sensational. They are one of my most favorite animals.
I love how you've gotten them to stand to attention on command They must have known you were taking their photo and posed for you. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
No I think that was the "Have you taken the photo yet" look, I asked her to stay still in the next one... Crop does look better and a good idea Yeah the blown section was there in the preview, but I didn't want to underexpose as I wasn't sure how much I could have recovered. The standing to attention of the Meerkats is a trick they've learnt when someone walks up to their enclosure holding a bag near the edge of the wall. I think half of all the photos I took at Taronga were of the Meerkats, my wife adores them. Cheers Brett
Now that I like! Thanks! Brett
Now this is my favourite animal. A bit young to be called King, so perhaps Prince?
Shot with the 70-300G @ 130mm through the wonderful glass that everyone uses now. Brett
So Brett, is that the Nikkor AFG 70-300mm F4-5.6 lense?
If so, that is bloody amazing. Do you have the shooting data for that tiger shot? I'm half considering selling my Sigma 70-300mm APO super macro, never been able to achieve those sort of shots with it. Maybe it's user error I don't know. Although I just saw this.....some of them are APO II so I dunno what the difference is: http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/browse?id=28325
Yes it is that lens, I've heard (never used the Sigma as the APO II was more expensive and the 70-300G was a lens to learn with) that the APO II is a good lens. Focal Length: 130mm 1/80 sec - F/4.2 Sensitivity: ISO 200 Tone Comp: User-Defined Custom Curve (WW 3.5) One thing that I always do with the 70-300G is use the UnSharp Mask feature under Nikon Capture, which really helps bring out the detail in the photo. I've found the WW 3.5 curve to give me the best results with what I shoot straight off camera in good lighting. Cheers Brett
I assume this photo was taken freestanding, no tripod etc.
ps. I only have the APO I not the II, not sure what the difference is. Whether the optics are greatly improved or whether it was something else in the lense that they changed. pps. my cat is cuter - http://forum.d70users.com/viewtopic.php?t=1091
Tigers make great subjects. You've nailed some 'life' in that animal too. Well done...
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Previous topic • Next topic
20 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|