Opinions on my PS work on this image.Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Opinions on my PS work on this image.[img]http://www.fototime.com/{8F238559-ABE2-41D3-9075-13D0709B0103}/picture.JPG[/img]
It is a good treatment? Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Willy wombat,
In my humble opinion colouring this photo the way you have done doesn't really work for me. But then I am not a great fun of that kind of work and it is really only my personal taste. I recon if you are keen to keep this direction just keep going and master it. At the end of day everything is possible Regards, K.Polak
Have you tried a B/W conversion with this image? As it is there is no great indication of contrast which detracts.It may look better on your monitor than it does here.
In the end we know Nothing, but in the meantime Learn like crazy.
Your Camera Does Matter Nikon D70 D200 D300 PPOK
Was away this weekend so i didnt get a chance to follow up on this. B+W conversion using gorman version, and then adjusted blue chanel and saturation from the horizon down. TMany thanks to all others who gave an opinion. Kipper - you made me laugh Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
The colouring doesn't really work for me, I think the blue foam in the centre of the shot looks a bit weird.
I guess it was taken with the kit lens? The barrel distortion is pretty bad on this lens at the wide end, maybe consider correcting the curved horizon in PS. Cheers What's another word for "thesaurus"?
WW
For my liking, it is just a little too blue. Also, the water seems to be a bit dark and could use some more contrast (at least on this monitor anyway - not sure if this is the same for everyone else ?). If this was brightened to give the foreground some detail, I feel it would lift the image dramatically. Just my opinion though Have you thought about keeping the sky AND the cliff in B&W, with the water coloured blue ? Perhaps another option Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|