Move over Manfrotto!!

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Move over Manfrotto!!

Postby bago100 on Sat Nov 27, 2004 7:43 am

As seen in the Aldi catalogue, footex to your letterbox soon

Image

Well, what are you waiting for!! :D

Graham
User avatar
bago100
Senior Member
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 6:42 pm
Location: Shanghai China until Feb 2010

Postby birddog114 on Sat Nov 27, 2004 7:51 am

Bago,
It's nice and cheap but it's for small and compact camera P&S, won't work well with DSLR, perhaps for small lens or macro
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Raydar on Sat Nov 27, 2004 7:54 am

Yeah Idon't think a D70 with a 70-200 VR hanging off it wold have to much suport!!!! :?

Any thing above a small fart would have a good chance of blowing it over :oops:

Cheers
Ray :P
>> All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism<<
User avatar
Raydar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1366
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 7:57 am
Location: Lismore, Northern - NSW

Postby gstark on Sat Nov 27, 2004 8:13 am

I can just see it now ... show it the 80-400 and watch it scamper away in fear.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Killakoala on Sat Nov 27, 2004 9:45 am

Yeah, but it high quality, weapons grade aluminium. The sort they use in ICBMs.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby Greg B on Sat Nov 27, 2004 3:44 pm

Poon could probably punch one out for $1-83.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby MattC on Sat Nov 27, 2004 4:43 pm

I look at those inexpensive tripods with the SB800 in mind. Small ballhead would be ideal for mounting a flash.

Cheers

Matt
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA

Postby Charandane on Sat Nov 27, 2004 5:15 pm

I don't think Manfrotto will be moving anywhere in the near future based on this flimsy pod. :lol:
Regards,

Andy
User avatar
Charandane
Newbie
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 5:12 pm
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Postby Andyt on Sat Nov 27, 2004 5:37 pm

It looks like the one the salesman "threw-in" when I bought my D70, I still have it in its box, waiting to give it away to some unsuspecting P&S person. Until then its an emergency (xmass) present for a teenager. :twisted:
User avatar
Andyt
Member
 
Posts: 324
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 11:17 pm
Location: Port Hedland North Western Australia

Postby gstark on Sat Nov 27, 2004 6:33 pm

mattco6974 wrote:I look at those inexpensive tripods with the SB800 in mind. Small ballhead would be ideal for mounting a flash.


Matt,

Interesting thought, but possibly not workable, as I expect that these will be too short for where you need to place your lighting.

IME, the typical extension of these types of tripods is around 5' - 5'6", whereas for lighting, I want to have up to 8' so that the lighting, onto a 6' subject, is still coming somewhat from above.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby MattC on Sat Nov 27, 2004 9:19 pm

You would be right about its height being insufficient for normal portrait work. I was thinking in terms of macro work using a backdrop (white or black foam board). For that sort of work 4-5 feet is sufficient - for me any way. I usually setup with my subject not more than 18 inches (usually closer) above the table (or floor). This is about the only good use I can see for these el cheapo tripods. If they are up to carrying an umbrella as well that would be a huge bonus.

Cheers

Matt
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA

Postby kipper on Sun Dec 05, 2004 11:50 am

Hey, this looks like the cheapo tripod that my old man has that I use sometimes on my D70. I hate it, but at the moment manfrotto/gitzo are just out of my reach.
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby gstark on Sun Dec 05, 2004 12:34 pm

kipper wrote:Hey, this looks like the cheapo tripod that my old man has that I use sometimes on my D70. I hate it, but at the moment manfrotto/gitzo are just out of my reach.


Kipper,

You might want to take a look at the Manfrotto tabletop tripod with its tiny ballhead.

Just for fits and giggles we mounted my 80-400VR onto this, and then mounted my D70 onto the backend of that. We were quite surprised at the strength and stability that this pocketable tripod provided to this heavyweight combo;

Here is Onyx's shot of the setup.



We then mounted one of the RRS ballheads onto the tripod, and that turnmed a quite acceptable scenario into one that was solid and absolutely useable. Either would work, with the RRS making it about as solid as you could expect given the (lack of) mass of the 'pod.

The only improvement you could make would be with either tent pegs or gaffa tape to secure the tripod.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW


Return to General Discussion