Working at Sydney FishmarketModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Working at Sydney FishmarketI took this photo yesterday while visiting Sydneys fishmarket. Please can you comment on my B&W conversion. I followed Matt K. technique for converting colour to B&W and want an honest opinion whether this shot speaks to you or the B&W tonal range, contrast etc is way off...
Its quite grainy - but i like it. Nice saturation in the darker areas of the shot.
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
I like the image... Composition and contrast is good, but as WW said it appears to be quite noisy...
Was this introduced, did you use high ISO, or was the original underexposed??? Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Leek & WW the orig image was underexposed.
Played with Shadow/Highlight in Photoshop before converting to B&W using Matt K. method.
OK... the foreground seems to be pretty good, but the noise in the bokeh is a little distracting...
Some noise reduction might help to smooth it a bit... Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Thanks pippin88 and Leek for your honest feedback. Thats exactly what I am looking for.
Cheers ozczecho
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|