CloudsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
CloudsI was bored the other day at work, and just started picking clouds out to shoot. Also been fiddling with Rawshooter, and these are the results.
Oops, no photos. Last edited by Alpha_7 on Wed Sep 07, 2005 10:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Alpha_7,
Can I be critical here? I do shoot sky, because I find that pattern and colour up there can be simply impressive. Also I found that is not easy to shoot sky or clouds. Not only because of high contrast, that is the smallest problem. Real difficulty is showing well known subject in new, fresh, unusual, catching, original way. Somehow similar to shooting roofs, you see This needs being able to see composition, shape, colour pattern, detail etc., which I recon is somehow missing in your photos (but remember, it is only my personal point of view and it only depends on you how you will interpret that). I am not saying I am much better. Propably not, considering number of shutter releases I have done and number good photos of sky I have got But one of the best I have got is one presented below. I hope this can give you and idea what I am talking about and can help you in your quest for perfect sky Regards, K.Polak
Thanks Krystian,
You can most certainly be critical I value any criticism or suggestions, I actually only shot the clouds as nothing else was happening. I've been having fun with this Rawshooter program just playing with the sliders watching what details come in and out of view. Oh, and I really like that shot you posted. There isn't any areas which are to bright or dark, and the colours a great. (Plus you got the plane flying in the "clear zone". Nice work!
I recon one of the most important issues with shotting sky and clouds is to not overexpose. It can look bad if there are completly washed out areas. Subtle play of sunrays might be lost.
Patience is also advisable. Just wait for half on one hour and watch. Dont rush. Regards, K.Polak
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|