Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1 with APS-C size CMOS

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1 with APS-C size CMOS

Postby birddog114 on Thu Sep 08, 2005 6:39 pm

Sony has just annouced the new DSC-R1
APS-C size 10.8 million pixel CMOS sensor

Is the D200 will be with the Sony APS-C size CMOS, 10 MP?
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby johndec on Thu Sep 08, 2005 6:41 pm

Interesting, there has been rumours that the D200 will be 10mp not 12mp, this release can only add weight to those rumours :shock:
If I'm alone in a forest and my wife is not around to hear what I say, am I still wrong ??
User avatar
johndec
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1327
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200....

Postby gstark on Thu Sep 08, 2005 6:50 pm

There's a cat amongst the pigeons!
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Nnnnsic on Thu Sep 08, 2005 6:53 pm

When Dad suggested to me that the D2x would be 12mp, I said no wya... it seemed silly to release a slightly lighter version of the D2x.

Nikon would either have to go down or up in the mp battle, and if they went down, which they would with this sensor, I'm sure the price would too.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby johndec on Thu Sep 08, 2005 7:10 pm

After a quick glance at the preview on dpreview:

Good:
160-3200 ISO

Bad:
Slightly smaller sensor than Nikon or Canon so you are looking at about a 1.7x crop factor.

Nikon: 23.7mm x 15.6mm
Canon: 22.8mm x 14.8mm
Sony: 21.5mm x 14.4mm PS: It has virtually the same pixel density as the D2X sensor.
If I'm alone in a forest and my wife is not around to hear what I say, am I still wrong ??
User avatar
johndec
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1327
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200....

Postby birddog114 on Thu Sep 08, 2005 7:27 pm

Who know?, it could be the sensor of the new D200, if it's the case, I won't touch it.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby pippin88 on Thu Sep 08, 2005 10:56 pm

I doubt they'd want to have a different crop factor sensor in there line up. Arn't the DX lenses designed around 1.5?
- Nick
Gallery
User avatar
pippin88
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1107
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:42 pm
Location: Newcastle / Sydney

Postby birddog114 on Fri Sep 09, 2005 7:00 am

pippin88 wrote:I doubt they'd want to have a different crop factor sensor in there line up. Arn't the DX lenses designed around 1.5?


That's 10MP on Sony Cybrershot or say 1.65x crop factor, but it can be 12MP with 1.5x with Nikon using the same SONY sensor.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby tschoi on Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:14 am

I agree with Birddog. If Nikon does use this sensor in D200, I won't touch that either.
D70, 18-70DX, 50 1.8D, 105 2.8 Macro
tschoi
Newbie
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 10:50 am
Location: Brisbane, QLD

Postby DaveB on Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:34 am

tschoi wrote:If Nikon does use this sensor in D200, I won't touch that either.

That seems a bold statement. There are lots of other things that make up a camera rather than just the number of pixels. Assume for the sake of argument that a new Nikon DSLR was to come out tomorrow using this sensor. There are lots of things we don't know about it:
  • Dynamic range - how good is it in the shadows?
  • Frame rate
  • Sync speed
And those are just sensor-related things...
I would be surprised if this camera was positioned to out-perform the D2X in any significant way, but the step up from 6 Mp to 10ish Mp (ie. from D100/D70) would be a significant one. Personally I would hold off from rash judgments until the camera actually arrives...


Some of the DSC-R1 specs look very interesting, but one of the first things I looked for was details of the EVF (as there's no mirror box). It seems unchanged from the 828 - a disappointment.
It will be interesting to see how many RAW shots it will buffer. I will be disappointed if there is no buffer (like the 828) but then I might not be in the target market for this camera. ;)
User avatar
DaveB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
Location: Box Hill, Vic

Postby tschoi on Fri Sep 09, 2005 10:39 am

Yes. This sensor will capture better images than my current one in D70. But the other thing is that this sensor is SMALLER than current DX sensors and it means that my 18-70 will become even less wide and I will have to be further away from my daughter, especially when I'm using my 50mm F1.8d. And there isn't much room left in my house to back off. :(

It would be pretty bold thing for Nikon to release D200 with this sensor when Canon just released 5D, IMHO.

And it seems that frame rate is 3fps for R1, I believe that's the limit of the sensor.
D70, 18-70DX, 50 1.8D, 105 2.8 Macro
tschoi
Newbie
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 10:50 am
Location: Brisbane, QLD

Postby DStrom on Fri Sep 09, 2005 1:21 pm

I don't think Nikon would cange from the DX format unless they had no other option, if they were to change the sensor size surly it would be to full frame.
User avatar
DStrom
Member
 
Posts: 273
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 1:38 pm
Location: Erskineville, Sydney - Nikon D300 / D70

Postby Aussie Dave on Fri Sep 09, 2005 1:31 pm

DaveB wrote:Personally I would hold off from rash judgments until the camera actually arrives...


Couldn't have said it better myself :!:
Possibly the most logical sentence in this thread....IMHO :roll:
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby petal666 on Fri Sep 09, 2005 2:37 pm

DaveB wrote:
tschoi wrote: Personally I would hold off from rash judgments until the camera actually arrives...

Plenty of time then by the looks of it.
Canon 1D III
User avatar
petal666
Senior Member
 
Posts: 737
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 7:17 am
Location: Toowng QLD - 1D III


Return to General Discussion