Dog or no dog?Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
21 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Dog or no dog?Do you think the dog makes or brakes this photo?
I was actually waiting for the dog to finish his business before pressing the shutter, but then I thought... what the heck. On closer inspection at 100% zoom I think I may have been able to put this in the "Decisive moment" competition __________
Phillip **Nikon D7000**
What can I say??
"If your pictures aren't good enough, you're probably not close enough." Robert Capa.
D70 - Nikon 18-70 (Kit Lens), 50mm f1.4, 70-300G, SB-800, Manfrotto 190D tripod, 141RC head, and 676B monopod.
No need to photoshop, here's a 100% crop My apologies if you're having dinner. __________
Phillip **Nikon D7000**
Hmm!!
Not a good photo to see when you are eating a Polly Waffle. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Ho No! This is what happened to Mic with his inversions and to Mattk with his neat & in the middle.
Any chance of getting the site hacked again so that we can loose this thread? __________
Phillip **Nikon D7000**
I know you are all probably focused on the other end of the dog, but check out the look of absolute bliss on its face as it drops that Polly Waffle on the lawn!
It looks like the owners have no intention of coming back with a pooper-scooper either! TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
I think the dog is losing what is commonly known as a cable....bit thicker than a thread. "If your pictures aren't good enough, you're probably not close enough." Robert Capa.
D70 - Nikon 18-70 (Kit Lens), 50mm f1.4, 70-300G, SB-800, Manfrotto 190D tripod, 141RC head, and 676B monopod.
Mate, that's a Great Dane, you'd need to carry a shovel and a 20 gallon drum with you. __________
Phillip **Nikon D7000**
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Yuk!!!
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Hi Phillip
I think it breaks the photo, sorry....IMO. The subject of the photo is obviously the bridge, but as the dog is so small in frame, I don't feel it adds to the shot. If it was a closer shot of the dog, then perhaps..... Do you have one without the dog, to compare it to ? Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
Maybe I've got a bad sense of humour, but It brought tears to my eye's!! I can't stop laughing everytime I look at it!
Jase - 'Motorcycle Gallery' - 'Car Gallery'
Hi Dave Actually I don't have one without the dog, but I cloned it out and the photo seemed stangely out of balance. I then cropped the whole of the left side, some from the top and bottom so that the couple were not smack in the centre and came up with this. Somehow I don't think this photo would have got the same reaction as the original though. __________
Phillip **Nikon D7000**
Previous topic • Next topic
21 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|