DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
Hidding camera shake with PP, candid shotModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Hidding camera shake with PP, candid shot
2 year old kid on the lake, looking at the ducks through the wood bars of the deck as I was putting my camera in the back, so I had to take it quick and hand held with the 70-300mm ED lens. After raw convertion it didn't looked that good with the shake, so I decided to do some pp to make it look like a good photo, and I like the result. What do you guys think?
Looks great
Another way I hide oof or camera shake shots is to convert it to b&w and add noise giving it the old documentary feel. of course this only applies and suits certain type of pics. Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Maybe, like you said, I'm trying to be 100% clinically sharp, but coming from the printing industry as a photo retoucher and color corrector in pursue of the the best possible image for prinmting, I see more mistakes than the average person, kind of picky I guess. This is my first dslr camera ever (bought it a month ago) and still trying to learn how the D70 works.
Thank you guys for your comments.
Marcos,
You have presented a charming picture in which are contained a plethora of narrative possibilities and rewards. The power of the content holds sway over what you or I may consider to be technical inadequacies. Nevertheless it is reassuring to learn that there is somebody out there with your skills and experience in image evaluation. Seems one of the greatest pitfalls in modern times is PICTORIAL SALVATION BY EXCESSIVE USM, CONTRAST & SATURATION. How I rue the day that so much quality control was passed from the experts in little white dust-coats to the sciolist dilettantes. I look forward to seeing more work of this calibre. Thank you. _______________
Walter "Photography was not a bastard left by science on the doorstep of art, but a legitimate child of the Western pictorial tradition." - Galassi
Keep taking the medication...................you'll be right !!  D4|D3S|D700+MB-D10| 14-24 |24-70|70-200 f/2.8 VRII|70-200 f/4 VR|80-400 AF-S|500VR|Sigma 150 f/2.8 macro|TC's 1.4,1.7E & 2.0III|SB 900
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
- Mods Database • The team • Delete all board cookies • Reset blocks • All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
