Beach imagesModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
35 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Beach imagesHi guys.
Here are a couple of images taken at the beach this evening, on a very dull day colour-wise. I had the intention of taking photos to turn into black and whites, however after finding this green muck I thought it would enhance the photos quite a bit. Let me know what you think! Cheers, Owen.
Owen, they are both very good but the last one is tops. I can see them on an inspirational poster somewhere. It is a great shame there are houses in it, but some creative cropping will sort them out.
Awesome images. I am really liking the long exposure pics i've been seeing these last few weeks. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Owen
Both are great and I honestly can't pick between them. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
They're terrific Owen.
I think like the first one slightly more, due to it's flatter perspective, lighter overall tones and the fantastic capture of theat breaking wave on the rock. Go the green muck! It really enhances the images but I'd still love to see them in black and white. Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Thanks for all the encouraging comments guys. How are these images colour-wise? I've recently got a new monitor and I'm still getting used to it.
Cheers, Owen.
Fine on mine Owen. Very rich.
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Look pretty bloody good to me owen, well done.
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40 http://www.oz-images.com
I like them too Owen. Looks like you used a pretty wide angle lens could you give us the details.
Colour looks fine. I'd be interested to see it in B&W to compare but I think the colour will look better. Did you get wet? Regards
Jonesy
Owen the colours look pretty good to me. I also think they'll not look as good in B & W, btu I'm happy to be proved wrong
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Hi Owen...
I love the textures at the front of the second shot... What time of day were these taken at - what were the shutter speeds / apertures? Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Thanks again guys.
I just printed out the second image and it looks really dull... perhaps time to invest in a new printer. Anywho, here's a black and white of it. One thing I noticed is that the textures become more noticable and the green muck practically disappears.
I really gotta admit, the 2nd one looks bloody awesome.. but then i saw the B&W.. and damn its eye catching.. the textures and feeling really pop out... bloody nice work!!
Tim D70 - D200/MBD200 Coming soon - Too Much Gear, Not Enough Talent
My Site: http://www.digitalstill.net My Fishing Site: http://www.fishseq.com
Very nice shots, Owen. #1 is #1 for me.
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
I like the 2nd one. I wonder if a lower crop at the top would get rid of the houses and strengthen the image a little as wel (focus on the low down, dark and mysterious cloud then).
But still great images! Canon 20D and a bunch of lovely L glass and a 580EX. Benro tripod. Manfrotto monopod. Lowepro and Crumpler bags. And a pair of Sigma teleconverters, and some Kenko tubes. http://www.dionm.net/
Thanks again for all the comments. I will look at either cropping the second or cloning out the houses... but I kind of like the way that there is something in the distance that your eyes are lead to.
Cheers, Owen.
Thanks Nick and Craig.
... if you're into green muck, then I'll gladly tell you where this location is!
Fantastic shots Owen.
The last one is outstanding. Cheers
Mark http://www.photographicaustralia.com http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
It probably does look better without the houses.
I wonder what the value of that lost real estate is? It is a wonderful image. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Hi Poon. The EXIF data is: 18mm (kit lens) f 22.0 1/2 sec ISO200 Taken on a velbon tripod which now has rusty legs Cheers, Owen.
Thanks for the comments guys. They really encourage me to get out more and take more photos - I've been very slack lately. I imagine that real estate that I demolished would have been worth more than I'll make in my lifetime
Hi Poon. They were shot in Raw and then converted to 16-bit TIFF in Rawshooter Essentials, and then resized and changed to jpeg in photoshop.
Cheers, Owen.
Wow man, love them both, print and poster them immediately!
Max President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
The one without the houses is so much better. For me it has removed the ugliness of suburbia and introduced the solitude of nature, it's enhanced the image beautifully. Really good clone work too.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
#2 without the houses has a great deal of appeal. The colours are fantastic and the lead up to the horizon does it for me - well done
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Previous topic • Next topic
35 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|