Question on Printing.

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Question on Printing.

Postby mic on Wed Dec 01, 2004 3:38 pm

Can anyone help me with this one ?

Say I take a RAW from my D70 then convert to jpg to get printed at my printers.

How do I find out what is the biggest size I can print to is ?

What is the size before you loose the fine quality of the image ?

Thanks,

Mic. :shock:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby mic on Wed Dec 01, 2004 3:41 pm

If anybody is wondering, what the hell is he doing with Wonder Woman as he Logo.

I forgot to put my Signature in.

Just so you don't think I'm Mad. ??

Mic. :lol:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby Greg B on Wed Dec 01, 2004 4:59 pm

You don't need to ask "Why Wonder Woman" mic. Makes perfect sense to me.

:)
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby gstark on Wed Dec 01, 2004 5:13 pm

mic wrote:Just so you don't think I'm Mad.


Do you think it's working? :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby gooseberry on Wed Dec 01, 2004 5:18 pm

With a 3000x2000 size image, you can print at 12" x 8" (Super 8R) size and still get a dpi of 250, which is a very good resolution for printing. I reckon you can get great 15" x 10" prints.
User avatar
gooseberry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 541
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 7:18 pm
Location: Singapore

Postby mic on Wed Dec 01, 2004 5:53 pm

Well Gary,

Sometimes I do have to slow down and ask myself that question.

The funny thing is, I always get an answer from myself. Hmmmmm ? :lol:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby mic on Wed Dec 01, 2004 5:56 pm

Thanks Goose,

I was wondering if I could have got away with a 20x30 ?

But from what you say it doesn't look that way.

Mic.
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby ajo43 on Wed Dec 01, 2004 6:17 pm

getting away with a 20 x 30 depends on how close you plan on standing to the picture. I would say that if you hand it on a wall at head hight then hardly anyone would notice the quality issue.

One thing that you can do use use photoshop to extrapolate and resize your pic. Although not perfect this does work and I'm pretty confident you could get a very nice print at 20 x 30.
Regards

Jonesy
User avatar
ajo43
Member
 
Posts: 374
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 1:55 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby Matt. K on Wed Dec 01, 2004 6:28 pm

If you're original image is sharp and well exposed then then the only limit is the distance at which it will be viewed. A good printer can make you a 20 x 16 inch image that will sing...no problems. Let the printer do the upsizing.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby gooseberry on Wed Dec 01, 2004 6:36 pm

mic,

As aj043 mentioned, it depends on how close you are looking at it.

The sizes I was mentioning were if you were looking up close, like having the pics layed out on the desk in front of you. 30x20 I reckon would still look great if hung up on the wall.

Yeah, you can try resizing/interpolation (just do it in 10% increments) until you get an image the size of 6000x4000.

Actually I've seen a pic from a D2H (4 MP) that have been sized up and printed to a 3m size banner that's look pretty good.
User avatar
gooseberry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 541
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 7:18 pm
Location: Singapore

Postby Raydar on Wed Dec 01, 2004 6:45 pm

I have a 4 foot by 1.5 foot pan print on my wall taken with a Sony Cybershot 3.2 Meg pixel cam.
After stitching & resizing I got it printed to the size of the file that had been created.
From what I can remember the file size was a little over 250 Meg.

As has been said in former posts it depend on the distance it is viewed from as to weather you can see an pixilation but with an image of that size it’s best viewed from a distance so there is no real prob with people asking how many meg pixel cam was used.

Cheers
Ray :P
>> All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism<<
User avatar
Raydar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1366
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 7:57 am
Location: Lismore, Northern - NSW

unlimited ? ...

Postby christiand on Wed Dec 01, 2004 6:47 pm

Hi,

a little while ago at a UNI course I saw a fellow student increase the size of his 4Mb full size image of a model using Photoshop. He did it in increments; 10 % at a time. He ended up doing a life size print.
Something like 1m x 1.5m
Even at a viewing distance of 30cm NO pixelation was evident.
I've also seen a "life size" foto from a 1Mb image at the UNI.
Some pixelation evident, but from a 2 to 3 m viewing distance away an incredible photo.

Cheers
CD
User avatar
christiand
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra

Postby mudder on Wed Dec 01, 2004 7:07 pm

mic wrote:Thanks Goose,

I was wondering if I could have got away with a 20x30 ?
But from what you say it doesn't look that way.

Mic.


G'day Mic,

I've had a D70 shot of a waterfall printed at 20"x30" and it came up great... I was impressed as to how well it came up, although that was initally taken as a raw file and converted to single layer TIFF when PP was finished... That's with no changes to resolution, the printers simply printed it out at what-ever size I wanted... The printing place was using PhotoShop CS.

Dunno if that helps...

Cheers,
Mudder
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby Nnnnsic on Wed Dec 01, 2004 7:21 pm

I say you can get away with 20" x 30" but only if you use interpolation that plugins can give you.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby mic on Wed Dec 01, 2004 9:47 pm

Thanks Guys,

Looks like I will have to test a 20x30

I will let you all know how I go, once I get my extra Lenses later this week thanks to Birddog The Great !

My Babies are on their way ( 50mm 1.8 / 105mm Micro / 180mm 2.8 / SB 800
( I hope they aren't cold )

See what Lens Lust does to a man.

My D70 feels very NAKED at the moment.
I hope nobody takes a shot of it at the beach.

Good night,

I am off to dream about my Lenses.

Mic. :o
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC


Return to General Discussion