a bird finally - OwlModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
17 posts
• Page 1 of 1
a bird finally - OwlOwl - reared in captivity. Blown out highlights.
regards, Arthur
Now we are talking, thats a nice looking owl Arthur.
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40 http://www.oz-images.com
Ok, I assumed that must of been the case as I couldn't notice any wire, cage or glass between you and the bird... so you had to be in there or a wiz and PP.
Awesome Owl pic Arthur. I have never seen an owl so close up and in such detail. What camera are you using these days?
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Very difficult subject, exposure-wise, so it's not surprising that you have some blown highlights.
Strangely enough, perhaps fill-flash could have helped provide some more detail in the black eye area at an exposure value that wouldn't have burned out. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
That is an awesome shot Arthur. As Steve said, I too haven't seen such a close, detailed image of these wonderful birds before.
Perhaps you could have taken two shots, one exposed for the shadows and the other for the highlights, then merged the two as a composite. Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Nice one Arthur, I would have liked to have seen a little more of the owls face if it were possible.
Guys he probably couldn't use fill in flash 'cos I bought his beamer "The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"
D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
Previous topic • Next topic
17 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|