Nikon 28-200 help !

Newer members often state that they think their question is too basic, or stupid, or whatever, to be posted. Nothing could be further further from the truth in any section at DSLRUsers.com, but especially here. Don't feel intimidated. The only stupid question is the one that remains unasked. We were all beginners at one stage, and even the most experienced amongst us will admit to learning new stuff on a daily basis. Ask away! Please also refer to the forum rules and the portal page

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

Nikon 28-200 help !

Postby LOZ on Fri Sep 30, 2005 10:27 am

I have been offered a Nikon 28-200 lens and have no idea if I should purchase it or not :?: the chap that has it is asking $250 ono ($200) .Please help as I have never had any intension to own this lens and I am not shore of it's qualities ,the lens is 4 years old as new.
User avatar
LOZ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 615
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Hills

Postby Glen on Fri Sep 30, 2005 10:33 am

Loz, don't have one, but from the reviews it is an average lens with huge range, not dissimilar to the 70-300. That said I have seen good shots from it, just like the 70-300. Great range for travelling, my only thought is if you buy it will you say, "I am going to Kathmandu, wont be going again so want good shots, will take my 50 1.8 or 17-55 2.8 instead". If you have other choices it may turn out to be the ugly stepsister and never go to the ball :wink:
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby rokkstar on Fri Sep 30, 2005 10:36 am

I read a review where this lens was tested against similar zoom lengths from Tamron, Sigma and Canon and this came out on top.
Seems to be a very good lens for travelling, like Glen said.
For the price I would say it's not bad, but it depends on whether you think you will use it I guess.
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby Oneputt on Fri Sep 30, 2005 10:40 am

There are several Nikkor lens under this banner. To which particular lens are you referring?
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby LOZ on Fri Sep 30, 2005 10:47 am

Oneputt wrote:There are several Nikkor lens under this banner. To which particular lens are you referring?

good question Oneputt I will visit the owner today thanks all LOZ PS after I get back from fishing :lol: :lol:
User avatar
LOZ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 615
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Hills

Postby Oneputt on Fri Sep 30, 2005 10:58 am

Loz I own an Nikkor 80- 200 4.5-5.6 which I took on my Kimberley trip earlier in the year.

Whilst I now also own a 70-200VR I think that for what I did the slower lens was perfect. It is physically much smaller that the VR and is also very light, in fact a perfect travelling light lens. It also takes very sharp images. Don't be sucked in by the need for speed, unless of course you do :wink:
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby sirhc55 on Fri Sep 30, 2005 10:59 am

LOZ wrote:
Oneputt wrote:There are several Nikkor lens under this banner. To which particular lens are you referring?

good question Oneputt I will visit the owner today thanks all LOZ PS after I get back from fishing :lol: :lol:


So, I take it the owner is a fish 8)
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby DVEous on Fri Sep 30, 2005 11:57 am

... Obsolete ...
Last edited by DVEous on Sat May 03, 2014 10:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
DVEous
Senior Member
 
Posts: 687
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 1:32 pm

Postby LOZ on Fri Sep 30, 2005 12:02 pm

Thanks all it turned out to be a Tamron :evil: it was too big to be used as a bung for boat so I gave it a BIG miss It had lovely optics about the same as a brown Cab Sav bottle.
User avatar
LOZ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 615
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Hills

Postby Oneputt on Fri Sep 30, 2005 12:25 pm

Aha it was a Tamron Nikkor :lol:
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.


Return to Absolute Beginners Questions