Gloss Vrs Matte

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Gloss Vrs Matte

Postby MHD on Sat Oct 01, 2005 8:38 am

Only when there is not the option I always print Matte, when is Gloss a better option?

What are the pros and cons against the two media?
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby LostDingo on Sat Oct 01, 2005 8:53 am

Gloss typically has a bit more of the "wow" factor as opposed to the matte finish. I have read in several areas that matte finish can be more colour accurate but I'm not so ceratin.

One advantage with larger prints in gloss is when you have framed you can use an anti glare glass effectively creating your matte look. When you use the anti glare glass on a matte finish print all appears "soft"

Much as with anything else is personal preference. I actually prefer to have my prints that are framed on KODAK Potra metallic paper which works well with landscapes, not preferred with potraiture
User avatar
LostDingo
Senior Member
 
Posts: 951
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 8:18 am
Location: Rozelle

Postby stubbsy on Sat Oct 01, 2005 9:02 am

Interesting question Scott.

For me I always print colour on Gloss and B & W on Satin. I never use Matte
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby MATT on Sat Oct 01, 2005 12:52 pm

I prefer that "WOW" factor for colour using gloss. I feel they just look better.

I print B+W on matte and am yet to try satin.


my 2 cents

amtt
User avatar
MATT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1748
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Location: Biloela, QLD-----nikon--D700-----

Postby MattC on Sat Oct 01, 2005 12:53 pm

Very interesting question.

I always print colour on semigloss (full gloss does not do it for me here) and have not printed enough B&W to make a decision there. I am leaning towards high gloss paper, mainly for its contrast.

I think that there was at least one famous photographer (AA?) who printed B&W on high gloss paper.
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA

Postby sirhc55 on Sat Oct 01, 2005 1:12 pm

Matte :D
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Dug on Sat Oct 01, 2005 8:24 pm

It depends on the image for me.

A "Soft" image, fog, beauty, or the like, matte

hard edged, cars, product, Gloss.

I have also been working on digital prints on watercolour paper very soft but a great effect.

I am entering them into "Art" competitions as Ink on Paper ;-)

it is amazing the reactions you get this is not Art it is a photograph!!!

I just love arguing with stuck up, snooty officials.
User avatar
Dug
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1082
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 7:58 pm
Location: maroochydore Q

Postby MattC on Sat Oct 01, 2005 8:27 pm

Know what you mean. Photography is an art :) The argument is fairly simple.
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA

Postby Dug on Sat Oct 01, 2005 8:44 pm

try explaining that to painters!!!!!! :-)
User avatar
Dug
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1082
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 7:58 pm
Location: maroochydore Q

Postby BBJ on Sat Oct 01, 2005 9:17 pm

All my photo sales i get done in matte, i like the look.
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40
http://www.oz-images.com
User avatar
BBJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3651
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:49 pm
Location: Mt Gambier South Australia-D70-D2X

Postby MattC on Sat Oct 01, 2005 10:03 pm

Dug wrote:try explaining that to painters!!!!!! :-)


Then those painters are not artists (just pretentious wannabes :) ), otherwise they would recognise all forms of art :D
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA

Postby Matt. K on Sat Oct 01, 2005 10:28 pm

Scott
A good question......and I have to say...as a trained visual artist......it depends on the image and what works for you. There is no answer to your question....but I offer you this advice...always have a selection of gloss and Matte papers on hand. Gloss can enforce a feeling of modern, hard edge, high tech, young, youthful sharp and sophisiticated. Matte can support a feeling of old leather, antique, subtle, soft, sultry, erotic, moody and timeless. Very small images or portraits will look best on matte paper. Very large images usually pop on gloss. Experiment. Try your very best images on both and give yourself a few weeks of looking to determine what works, Matte creeps up over time...gloss hits you between the eyes and makes your hair stand on end.
I love paper. I love choice. I love images.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby meicw on Sat Oct 01, 2005 10:42 pm

I tend to use Ilford Smooth Pearl. Guess you would call that a semi-gloss.

Regards
Meicw
meicw
Member
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 2:12 pm
Location: Melbourne (Reservoir), Canon 5D

Postby cameraguy21773 on Sun Oct 02, 2005 12:15 am

I use Ilford Smooth Pearl for everything. It's a "luster" or "satin" finish paper that has plenty of shine for me. High gloss papers do provide lots of WOW factor but I think that for most nature shots I have the look I like.

I am experimenting with some heavyweight matte paper and just bought a box of rough watercolor. I think both might be good for B&W or a nice arty look for botanical macros. We'll see.
regards
Mike Parker
Frederick, MD

Take Only Pictures, Leave Only Footprints
User avatar
cameraguy21773
Member
 
Posts: 214
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 10:16 am
Location: Frederick, Maryland USA - D2H, D1x (2), D70

Gloss V Matte

Postby Digidegs on Tue Oct 04, 2005 7:51 pm

Just my $0.02 worth.
I did a lot of large format digital printing. 1520MM wide by any length.
What works well is printing on gloss photopaper and if not framing but using as a poster is to cold laminate the print with a Sandtex laminate. There are various types of Sandtex, varying in finish. From satin to matte.
Great as it offers no reflection from any angle and colours look great.
If using a matte paper, results not as good as when laminating or framing, the gloss just comes alive and the laminate or satin or matte glass does the rest.
User avatar
Digidegs
Member
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 4:42 pm
Location: Perth

Postby JordanP on Tue Oct 04, 2005 10:52 pm

Matte or Satin is my preference.
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby robw25 on Tue Oct 04, 2005 11:04 pm

meicw wrote:I tend to use Ilford Smooth Pearl. Guess you would call that a semi-gloss.

Regards
Meicw


yes i have been very impressed with the ilford smooth pearl, haven't tried matt

cheers rob
User avatar
robw25
Senior Member
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:31 pm
Location: whyalla south australia


Return to General Discussion