Tulip festival, Melbourne 2005

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Tulip festival, Melbourne 2005

Postby Alex on Sun Oct 02, 2005 8:37 pm

Family and I went to the tulip festival today. Perfect weather and a great day. I've never seen so many DSLR users as I have today :-). Here are a first few. Any comments/ critique are encouraged.

1. Kit lens, 18mm, 1/30s f20, CPL

Image

2. Kit lens, 46 mm, 1/40s, f20, CPL

Image

3. Nikkor 80-200 4.5-5.6, 150mm, f5.6, 1/1250s

Image

4. Kit lens, 24 mm, 1/25s, f20, CPL

Image

5. Nikkor 80-200 4.5-5.6, 150mm, f5.3, 1/2500s

Image


6. Kit lens, 48 mm, 1/25s, f18, CPL

Image


7. Nikkor AF 28mm, 1/5000s, f2.8

Image


Thank you

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby genji on Sun Oct 02, 2005 8:52 pm

beautiful photos Alex!!!

the cpl really brings out the colour.

gotta get one!

but why are there no photos of the your wife among the fields of tulips??
[every man's work is always a portrait of himself.
Ansel Adams, Carmel, California, 1979]
User avatar
genji
Senior Member
 
Posts: 570
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:08 pm
Location: Carlton ------->D[enter number here]<-------

Postby stubbsy on Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:00 pm

Alex. Where do I start.

#2 is great, but I feel a tighter crop at the top might strengthen the image - possible crop horizontally at the roof line of the building to remove the tree and most of the sky to bring our focus more to the lovely curving rows of flowers.

#3 - like the colours and the boke is superb

#4 - I really like the angle here as it leads the eye wonderfully down the rows of colour to the windmill in the distance

#7 - a great example of artistic use of DOF to focus on the main subject. This is made much stronger by the matching colours in the background. That said I find the large OOF object to the left of the centre petal distracting. Reality can be so untidy sometimes :wink: This image is of particular interest to me since I'm thinking of getting a wide prime with specs like this as my next purchase.

Overall this is a collection of pics i'd have been proud to have taken. Thanks for sharing these.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Alex on Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:00 pm

Thanks very much for your comments, Tai. I have some of my wife and also mother-in-law :evil: in the fields, but they are for private collection :) Incidentally, there was a girl posing in the fields for someone else and I took her photo by accident - looks really good, but my wife hates it - go figure :wink: :lol:

Cheers
Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby Alex on Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:06 pm

stubbsy wrote:Alex. Where do I start.

#2 is great, but I feel a tighter crop at the top might strengthen the image - possible crop horizontally at the roof line of the building to remove the tree and most of the sky to bring our focus more to the lovely curving rows of flowers.

#3 - like the colours and the boke is superb

#4 - I really like the angle here as it leads the eye wonderfully down the rows of colour to the windmill in the distance

#7 - a great example of artistic use of DOF to focus on the main subject. This is made much stronger by the matching colours in the background. That said I find the large OOF object to the left of the centre petal distracting. Reality can be so untidy sometimes :wink: This image is of particular interest to me since I'm thinking of getting a wide prime with specs like this as my next purchase.

Overall this is a collection of pics i'd have been proud to have taken. Thanks for sharing these.



Wow, thanks for the support an encouragement, Peter. Even more thanks for the suggestions. I did a crop of No.1 as you suggested - improved heaps. Also the OOF object in No.7 - yes, agree absolutely, I had concerns about it before posting and obviously not for nothing, it does distract attention.

I got the 28mm prime as 2nd hand from a member on this forum. I find it really interesting to work with. It's not a "D" version but it still works well.

Cheers

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby Killakoala on Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:10 pm

Awesome colour. SOme of those would make murderous jigsaws :)
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby kipper on Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:20 pm

Sigh, wish I had a ballhead for my tripod. I'd be up to the hills in a flash :(
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby Alex on Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:24 pm

Thanks, Steve :) Darryl: What do you mean a tripod? All mine were hand held :) But many were with tripods. There was one D70 user with a 70-200VR - no tripod ...


Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby PiroStitch on Sun Oct 02, 2005 10:25 pm

Alex, those are some great pics but my retinas are burnt now with all that colour :)

The last pic is my fave, very artistic :D
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques