Few architectural snapshots

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Few architectural snapshots

Postby krpolak on Sun Oct 02, 2005 4:47 pm

Few more snapshots. Comments and impresions welcome!

Regards,

K.Polak

1.
Image


2.
Image


3.
Image


4.
Image
User avatar
krpolak
Member
 
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 5:07 pm
Location: North Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:10 pm

I like these Krystian, I find shots 1 and 2 are stronger then the last two, you do have a great eye for interest architecture.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby ozczecho on Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:49 pm

#2 is the pick for me, eventhough the shadow on the left hand side is starting to creep across. Like Alpha said, you have a great eye.
User avatar
ozczecho
Senior Member
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
Location: Beecroft, Sydney

Postby Sheetshooter on Sun Oct 02, 2005 7:32 pm

Krystian,

I must concur that #2 is the hero here. The others seems to lack your signature minimalist distillation.

Cheers,
_______________

Walter

"Photography was not a bastard left by science on the doorstep of art, but a legitimate child of the Western pictorial tradition." - Galassi
Sheetshooter
Senior Member
 
Posts: 891
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 8:29 pm
Location: Lushly Latino Leichhardt

Postby marcotrov on Sun Oct 02, 2005 7:41 pm

#2 and #4 Krystian. Great shots. A bit of mood, nice lines and shadow play.
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby krpolak on Sun Oct 02, 2005 7:47 pm

Thanks guysfor comments!

Well, for me each shot is different:

#1 shows great, detailed architecture. I am pleased look at that even if photo at itself is not perfect ;-)

#2, as you mentioned Sheetshooter, is a minimalist distillation of spotted architectural element. I start to be a bit tired of that kind of photography. Propably its time to move on.

#3 catches me as a modern castle.

#4 is record of something I found sometime ago. I am not sure if this shot fully works, but wanted to give it a go.

Thanks again,

K.Polak
User avatar
krpolak
Member
 
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 5:07 pm
Location: North Sydney

Postby stubbsy on Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:07 pm

Krystian

#4 is the standout for me. I like the contrast between the two buildings. Horizontals hitting verticals etc. A very strong image.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby leek on Sun Oct 02, 2005 10:48 pm

Krystian,
I like #1, though I don't precisely know why - did you straighten that shot to correct the vertical distortion???
#2 has an appeal due to the interplay of 2 diagonals...
#3 - I think that I can see the turret in your mind's eye... :-)
#4 Wins for me due to the interraction of the vertical and the diagonal that is really horizontal :-)
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby krpolak on Sun Oct 02, 2005 11:12 pm

Leek,

I like #1, though I don't precisely know why - did you straighten that shot to correct the vertical distortion???


Realy just a bit. I stand far away so there was almost no perspective distortion. I recon that this photo catches with regular complexity, mixed of architectural styles, its vertical building up and worn out texture. Just together brings me memories from fantasy literature etc

#2 has an appeal due to the interplay of 2 diagonals...


I agree. Plus heavy shadow makes this metal gates even more havier.

#3 - I think that I can see the turret in your mind's eye...


Or maybe rather the last tower, final defence point. Also somehow looks like a superstucture of WWII ships.

#4 Wins for me due to the interraction of the vertical and the diagonal that is really horizontal


I found what was wrong with this image. Balance between the two part didn't work. Right building was too dominat due to its strong apearance. So to keep the image balanced it has to take less space. Here is second version. For me looks better now .

Regards,

K.Polak



Image
User avatar
krpolak
Member
 
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 5:07 pm
Location: North Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Mon Oct 03, 2005 2:47 am

The second crop is much improved, previously I was struggling to appreciate this shot, but now given this slightly different take on it I really like it.

Amusingly the building on the right now reminds me of a boiled sweet or a black and white barber's pole.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby PiroStitch on Mon Oct 03, 2005 3:08 am

I prefer the first two. The first one at first didn't look that great to me but the front portion then popped out...heheh technically speaking ;)

I like the repetitive play of the shadows and how the top shadows nearly run parallel with the patterns of the doors. The shadows on the ground seem to mimic the patterns on the door as well.

Definitely well spotted :)
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby Sheetshooter on Mon Oct 03, 2005 8:21 am

krpolak wrote:#2, as you mentioned Sheetshooter, is a minimalist distillation of spotted architectural element. I start to be a bit tired of that kind of photography. Propably its time to move on.


Krystian,

That is highly commendable. It is ALWAYS time to move on. There is so much work about done either by those caught in a rut or those lacking your intellect, wit and visual acuity that the dangers of stagnation inundate us and are to be abhorred.

But moving on brings with it periods of transformation during which new approaches and aspirations must coalesce and solidify. These periods of transition can be most beneficial if you accept and identify that momentary shortfalls are just that - momentary and lacking. The experience of that propels you into new territory.

Your work is one of the few reasons for my participation in this site and I would hate to see you lose your edge. Your eye is still recognising the potential but in shots such as #1 you have settled for the simple and immediate solution rather than thinking through the process and optimising the timing, the light and the essence of the motif. Perhaps I am harsh, but I would not be if I did not know that you are far more capable than a couple of these shots indicate. I realise that you did call your thread Architectural Snapshots but snapshots are not your province - leave them to those who struggle to perceive anything else.

You have a gift that others can only dream of and so, in my opinion, you owe it to yourself to push the envelope rather than sit safely padded and protected in a package of complacency. As usual I anticipate your next offering with enthusiasm.

Cheers,
_______________

Walter

"Photography was not a bastard left by science on the doorstep of art, but a legitimate child of the Western pictorial tradition." - Galassi
Sheetshooter
Senior Member
 
Posts: 891
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 8:29 pm
Location: Lushly Latino Leichhardt

Postby krpolak on Mon Oct 03, 2005 11:24 am

Thanks guys again for your valuable comments and especially for you Sheetshooter. As I mentioned before I always appreciate your response.

Talking about #1, you are right. I didnt take my time to make this photo. This is why I called it snapshot, simply because it is even if its appearance is impresive.

I feel I will leave architecture for a moment and jump back to new worlds and broken puppets :)

Regards,

K.Polak
User avatar
krpolak
Member
 
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 5:07 pm
Location: North Sydney

Postby Sheetshooter on Mon Oct 03, 2005 11:39 am

Kristian,

There are snapshots and there are snapshots. Some are extraodimary in that the motif flourishes with minimal interference from the photographer - a genre that I may well pursue myself once I get settled and can go out with just my 5D. The other type is little short of an abomination; all too frequently touted - and not always as a snapshot I am grieved to report.

Your photographs are generaly eloquent and get straight to the point - irrespective of the subject matter I see that as the goal ffor you to continue to aim for. The works of many others are just visual gobbledygook - undeveloped baby talk through the eyes and infused along the way with hubris and ego - I'd be loathe to see you go there: it's just an elephants' graveyard for technology and art.

Cheers,
_______________

Walter

"Photography was not a bastard left by science on the doorstep of art, but a legitimate child of the Western pictorial tradition." - Galassi
Sheetshooter
Senior Member
 
Posts: 891
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 8:29 pm
Location: Lushly Latino Leichhardt


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques