Long exposure D2x

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Long exposure D2x

Postby Heath Bennett on Wed Oct 05, 2005 9:00 am

This shot was taken with long exposure noise reduction on. I think it does pretty well. ISO 100, 30 sec exposure. Birdie, Poon, or all: what is a good price to pay for the cable release so I can do longer than 30 sec exp?

I can't believe that I got the urge to do a technical test. I am not usually this technical by nature. Please excuse the dark shape in the lower left hand corner. Make sure that friends stay out of the frame :D .

entire shot showing very loosely where 100% crops came from:
Image

crop from middle:
Image

crop from middle sharpened:
Image

crop from noise prone dark sky (note: monochromatic, and worst case scenario):
Image
HB
User avatar
Heath Bennett
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1351
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 8:49 pm
Location: Morisset/Bonnells Bay

Postby Oneputt on Wed Oct 05, 2005 9:04 am

Interesting Heath, is this an example of where mps count?
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby MHD on Wed Oct 05, 2005 9:07 am

very nice Heath! I think it is a case where good CMOS sensor technology helps
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby Heath Bennett on Wed Oct 05, 2005 9:34 am

MHD wrote:very nice Heath! I think it is a case where good CMOS sensor technology helps


perhaps. but if noise reduction (dark frame subtraction) is turned off, the picture is literally littered with hot pixels EVERYWHERE. I think that CCD's are far less prone to this, from my experience with the D70. CMOS seems to definately need noise reduction, while CCD ...a more expensive technology from what I have heard... is better is this regard
HB
User avatar
Heath Bennett
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1351
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 8:49 pm
Location: Morisset/Bonnells Bay

Postby MHD on Wed Oct 05, 2005 9:36 am

Interesting, but it makes sense.. Individual sites on a CMOS sensor are solid state while CCD uses a well to trap charges formed from photon (light) impacts..
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby sheepie on Wed Oct 05, 2005 9:52 am

MHD wrote:Interesting, but it makes sense.. Individual sites on a CMOS sensor are solid state while CCD uses a well to trap charges formed from photon (light) impacts..

Yes, I was just thinking that! ....NOT!
just a little too technical for us poor mortals ;)

Thanks for this Heath - interesting to see, although I'd like to see same without the in-camera NR.
*** When getting there is half the fun! ***
User avatar
sheepie
Key Member
 
Posts: 3029
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia *** Nikon D200/D70 ***


Return to General Discussion